2005•Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)Requires access

Theological Reflection: Methods

Elaine Graham, Heather Walton, Frances Ward, Katja Stuerzenhofecker

Open publisher page 173 citations

Abstract

Over the past fifteen years, as interest in postmodern approaches to knowledge has grown among pastoral theologians and practitioners, there have been lively discussions about methodology. Articulating one's method, described by Jennings (1990) as third order reflections can be likened to the work of navigation; such discussions chart the course of where pastoral theology has been and where it is going as a discipline. Indeed, the bibliography of articles and chapters on pastoral theological method, from Hiltner's (1958) Preface to Pastoral Theology, to Browning (1983), Poling and Miller (1985), Hunter and Burck (1990), Ramsay (2004), and Marshall (2004), provides important historical markers for defining who pastoral theologians and practitioners are and what they do. Such methodological discussions have become even more pressing given the burgeoning interest in spirituality and health, an arena where many psychologists and health practitioners show an alarming theological naivete by limiting themselves to using first order religious language and premodern approaches to religion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Over the past fifteen years, as interest in postmodern approaches to knowledge has grown among pastoral theologians and practitioners, there have been lively discussions about methodology. Articulating one's method, described by Jennings (1990) as third order reflections can be likened to the work of navigation; such discussions chart the course of where pastoral theology has been and where it is going as a discipline. Indeed, the bibliography of articles and chapters on pastoral theological method, from Hiltner's (1958) Preface to Pastoral Theology, to Browning (1983), Poling and Miller (1985), Hunter and Burck (1990), Ramsay (2004), and Marshall (2004), provides important historical markers for defining who pastoral theologians and practitioners are and what they do. Such methodological discussions have become even more pressing given the burgeoning interest in spirituality and health, an arena where many psychologists and health practitioners show an alarming theological naivete by limiting themselves to using first order religious language and premodern approaches to religion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 173 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Over the past fifteen years, as interest in postmodern approaches to knowledge has grown among pastoral theologians and practitioners, there have been lively discussions about methodology. Articulating one's method, described by Jennings (1990) as third order reflections can be likened to the work of navigation; such discussions chart the course of where pastoral theology has been and where it is going as a discipline. Indeed, the bibliography of articles and chapters on pastoral theological method, from Hiltner's (1958) Preface to Pastoral Theology, to Browning (1983), Poling and Miller (1985), Hunter and Burck (1990), Ramsay (2004), and Marshall (2004), provides important historical markers for defining who pastoral theologians and practitioners are and what they do. Such methodological discussions have become even more pressing given the burgeoning interest in spirituality and health, an arena where many psychologists and health practitioners show an alarming theological naivete by limiting themselves to using first order religious language and premodern approaches to religion.

Key concepts: Spirituality, Order (exchange), Sociology, Theology, Religious studies, Philosophy, Medicine, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Theological Reflection: Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens