2021•Unpublished venueRequires access

Public Art and Public Culture in/of Public Space

Miodrag Mitrašinović, Vikas Mehta

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The social and political context in which public art in/and public space are defined, and acquire meaning, is often based on the idea that both ought to affirm the existing social contract. In public discourses and in policy-making circles alike, the way to achieve such an objective is either by building or by reinforcing social consensus, sometimes through coercion. Critical scholarship on public art has since 1970s argued that the meaning of “public art” and “art in public space” is always contingent on historical circumstances and should not be found through a search for the origins—of neither public space nor public art—but be continuously questioned in the context of present circumstances, and through democratic contestation. The work of Krzysztof Wodiczko departs from the recognition that democratic process is contingent upon the freedom of speech and expression in public space.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The social and political context in which public art in/and public space are defined, and acquire meaning, is often based on the idea that both ought to affirm the existing social contract. In public discourses and in policy-making circles alike, the way to achieve such an objective is either by building or by reinforcing social consensus, sometimes through coercion. Critical scholarship on public art has since 1970s argued that the meaning of “public art” and “art in public space” is always contingent on historical circumstances and should not be found through a search for the origins—of neither public space nor public art—but be continuously questioned in the context of present circumstances, and through democratic contestation. The work of Krzysztof Wodiczko departs from the recognition that democratic process is contingent upon the freedom of speech and expression in public space.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The social and political context in which public art in/and public space are defined, and acquire meaning, is often based on the idea that both ought to affirm the existing social contract. In public discourses and in policy-making circles alike, the way to achieve such an objective is either by building or by reinforcing social consensus, sometimes through coercion. Critical scholarship on public art has since 1970s argued that the meaning of “public art” and “art in public space” is always contingent on historical circumstances and should not be found through a search for the origins—of neither public space nor public art—but be continuously questioned in the context of present circumstances, and through democratic contestation. The work of Krzysztof Wodiczko departs from the recognition that democratic process is contingent upon the freedom of speech and expression in public space.

Key concepts: Public culture, Public space, Space (punctuation), Political science, Computer science, Architectural engineering, Engineering, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public Art and Public Culture in/of Public Space — Research Paper | ScholarLens