2021•Unpublished venueRequires access

Ethnography & Theory in Anthropology

Ioan M. Lewis

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter proposes a multi-factorial interpretation of how the contrasting classical emphases in British social and American cultural anthropology appear to reflect and embody the circumstances of their formation. Traditionally, British social anthropology analyses social institutions from the perspective of an ethnographically based comparative sociology. This contrasts sharply with the culturological focus of American anthropology, particularly in its formative stages. American anthropologists usually possess a more sophisticated training in linguistics, yet paradoxically often seem less fluent in the relevant vernacular than their British colleagues. In the beginning, American anthropology was a rescue-operation, directed towards salvaging as much as possible from an archaic world smashed to pieces in the process of colonisation. In the colonial era under the ‘White Peace’, British anthropologists carried out research on societies within their overseas dependencies which, in the main, were administered by expatriate rather than settler officials. Unlike the American Indians, these were usually vigorously alive communities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter proposes a multi-factorial interpretation of how the contrasting classical emphases in British social and American cultural anthropology appear to reflect and embody the circumstances of their formation. Traditionally, British social anthropology analyses social institutions from the perspective of an ethnographically based comparative sociology. This contrasts sharply with the culturological focus of American anthropology, particularly in its formative stages. American anthropologists usually possess a more sophisticated training in linguistics, yet paradoxically often seem less fluent in the relevant vernacular than their British colleagues. In the beginning, American anthropology was a rescue-operation, directed towards salvaging as much as possible from an archaic world smashed to pieces in the process of colonisation. In the colonial era under the ‘White Peace’, British anthropologists carried out research on societies within their overseas dependencies which, in the main, were administered by expatriate rather than settler officials. Unlike the American Indians, these were usually vigorously alive communities.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter proposes a multi-factorial interpretation of how the contrasting classical emphases in British social and American cultural anthropology appear to reflect and embody the circumstances of their formation. Traditionally, British social anthropology analyses social institutions from the perspective of an ethnographically based comparative sociology. This contrasts sharply with the culturological focus of American anthropology, particularly in its formative stages. American anthropologists usually possess a more sophisticated training in linguistics, yet paradoxically often seem less fluent in the relevant vernacular than their British colleagues. In the beginning, American anthropology was a rescue-operation, directed towards salvaging as much as possible from an archaic world smashed to pieces in the process of colonisation. In the colonial era under the ‘White Peace’, British anthropologists carried out research on societies within their overseas dependencies which, in the main, were administered by expatriate rather than settler officials. Unlike the American Indians, these were usually vigorously alive communities.

Key concepts: Ethnography, Anthropology, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ethnography & Theory in Anthropology — Research Paper | ScholarLens