2021Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic SurgeryOpen access

Chronological analysis of surgical and oncological outcomes after the treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Sungho Lee, Gi Hong Choi, Dai Hoon Han, Kyung Sik Kim, Jin Sub Choi, Seoung Yoon Rho

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: Despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative supportive care, radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the only modality that can achieve long-term survival.We chronologically investigated surgical and oncological outcomes of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and analyzed the factors affecting overall survival.Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 165 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent liver resection with a curative intent.The patients were divided into groups based on the period when the surgery was performed: period I ( 2005-2011) and period II (2012-2018).The clinicopathological characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival outcomes were analyzed.Results: The patients' age, serum CA19-9 levels, and serum bilirubin levels at diagnosis were significantly higher in the period I group.There were no differences in pathological characteristics such as tumor stage, histopathologic status, and resection status.However, perioperative outcomes, such as estimated blood loss (1528.8 vs. 1034.1 mL, p=0.020) and postoperative severe complication rate (51.3% vs. 26.4%,p=0.022), were significantly lower in the period II group.Regression analysis demonstrated that period I (hazard ratio [HR]=1.591;95% confidence interval [CI]=1.049-2.414;p=0.029), preoperative serum bilirubin at diagnosis (HR=1.585;95% CI=1.058-2.374;p=0.026), and tumor stage (III, IV) (HR=1.671;95% CI: 1.133-2.464;p=0.010) were significantly associated with poor prognosis.The 5-year survival rate was better in the period II patients than in the period I patients (35.1% vs. 21.0%,p=0.0071).Conclusions: The surgical and oncological outcomes were better in period II.Preoperative serum bilirubin and advanced tumor stage were associated with poor prognosis in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.(

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Backgrounds/Aims: Despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative supportive care, radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the only modality that can achieve long-term survival.We chronologically investigated surgical and oncological outcomes of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and analyzed the factors affecting overall survival.Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 165 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent liver resection with a curative intent.The patients were divided into groups based on the period when the surgery was performed: period I ( 2005-2011) and period II (2012-2018).The clinicopathological characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival outcomes were analyzed.Results: The patients' age, serum CA19-9 levels, and serum bilirubin levels at diagnosis were significantly higher in the period I group.There were no differences in pathological characteristics such as tumor stage, histopathologic status, and resection status.However, perioperative outcomes, such as estimated blood loss (1528.8 vs. 1034.1 mL, p=0.020) and postoperative severe complication rate (51.3% vs. 26.4%,p=0.022), were significantly lower in the period II group.Regression analysis demonstrated that period I (hazard ratio [HR]=1.591;95% confidence interval [CI]=1.049-2.414;p=0.029), preoperative serum bilirubin at diagnosis (HR=1.585;95% CI=1.058-2.374;p=0.026), and tumor stage (III, IV) (HR=1.671;95% CI: 1.133-2.464;p=0.010) were significantly associated with poor prognosis.The 5-year survival rate was better in the period II patients than in the period I patients (35.1% vs. 21.0%,p=0.0071).Conclusions: The surgical and oncological outcomes were better in period II.Preoperative serum bilirubin and advanced tumor stage were associated with poor prognosis in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.(

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: Despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative supportive care, radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the only modality that can achieve long-term survival.We chronologically investigated surgical and oncological outcomes of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and analyzed the factors affecting overall survival.Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 165 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent liver resection with a curative intent.The patients were divided into groups based on the period when the surgery was performed: period I ( 2005-2011) and period II (2012-2018).The clinicopathological characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival outcomes were analyzed.Results: The patients' age, serum CA19-9 levels, and serum bilirubin levels at diagnosis were significantly higher in the period I group.There were no differences in pathological characteristics such as tumor stage, histopathologic status, and resection status.However, perioperative outcomes, such as estimated blood loss (1528.8 vs. 1034.1 mL, p=0.020) and postoperative severe complication rate (51.3% vs. 26.4%,p=0.022), were significantly lower in the period II group.Regression analysis demonstrated that period I (hazard ratio [HR]=1.591;95% confidence interval [CI]=1.049-2.414;p=0.029), preoperative serum bilirubin at diagnosis (HR=1.585;95% CI=1.058-2.374;p=0.026), and tumor stage (III, IV) (HR=1.671;95% CI: 1.133-2.464;p=0.010) were significantly associated with poor prognosis.The 5-year survival rate was better in the period II patients than in the period I patients (35.1% vs. 21.0%,p=0.0071).Conclusions: The surgical and oncological outcomes were better in period II.Preoperative serum bilirubin and advanced tumor stage were associated with poor prognosis in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.(

Key concepts: Medicine, Perioperative, Hazard ratio, Confidence interval, Stage (stratigraphy), Pathological, Bilirubin, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Chronological analysis of surgical and oncological outcomes after the treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens