2020International Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprosy SciencesOpen access

Melasma: Treatment modalities and response to treatment

Suma D Gudi, Lakshmipathi

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Melasma of the forearms seems to be a relatively common sign. It may be more common in older people and especially in postmenopausal women on supplementary oestrogen. The pigmentary change is macular and may be confluent or speckled. Like facial chloasma there is a sharp line of demarcation at the margins. In some there seems to be an element of erythema. A detailed history was elicited with reference to the duration, onset, progression, family history, obstetric history, gynaecologic history, cosmetic history and previous treatment. The adverse effects were seen in Regime-I. Common side effects were erythema (16.7%). burning (16.7%). Desquamation (6.7%) and pruritus (6.7%). Common side effects in Regime-II were erythema (30%). burning (10%), Desquamation (13.3%) and dryness (23.3). Common side effects in Regime-III were erythema (33.3%), burning (10%) and Desquamation (6.7%).Common side effects in Regime-IV were erythema (40%), burning (23.3%) and Desquamation (26.7%) pruritus (6.7%).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Melasma of the forearms seems to be a relatively common sign. It may be more common in older people and especially in postmenopausal women on supplementary oestrogen. The pigmentary change is macular and may be confluent or speckled. Like facial chloasma there is a sharp line of demarcation at the margins. In some there seems to be an element of erythema. A detailed history was elicited with reference to the duration, onset, progression, family history, obstetric history, gynaecologic history, cosmetic history and previous treatment. The adverse effects were seen in Regime-I. Common side effects were erythema (16.7%). burning (16.7%). Desquamation (6.7%) and pruritus (6.7%). Common side effects in Regime-II were erythema (30%). burning (10%), Desquamation (13.3%) and dryness (23.3). Common side effects in Regime-III were erythema (33.3%), burning (10%) and Desquamation (6.7%).Common side effects in Regime-IV were erythema (40%), burning (23.3%) and Desquamation (26.7%) pruritus (6.7%).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Melasma of the forearms seems to be a relatively common sign. It may be more common in older people and especially in postmenopausal women on supplementary oestrogen. The pigmentary change is macular and may be confluent or speckled. Like facial chloasma there is a sharp line of demarcation at the margins. In some there seems to be an element of erythema. A detailed history was elicited with reference to the duration, onset, progression, family history, obstetric history, gynaecologic history, cosmetic history and previous treatment. The adverse effects were seen in Regime-I. Common side effects were erythema (16.7%). burning (16.7%). Desquamation (6.7%) and pruritus (6.7%). Common side effects in Regime-II were erythema (30%). burning (10%), Desquamation (13.3%) and dryness (23.3). Common side effects in Regime-III were erythema (33.3%), burning (10%) and Desquamation (6.7%).Common side effects in Regime-IV were erythema (40%), burning (23.3%) and Desquamation (26.7%) pruritus (6.7%).

Key concepts: Desquamation, Erythema, Dermatology, Medicine, Melasma, Family history, Hyperpigmentation, Side effect (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Melasma: Treatment modalities and response to treatment — Research Paper | ScholarLens