2021Desalination and Water TreatmentOpen access

Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and environmental (4E) and carbon footprint analysis of coupling the various energy recovery devices with seawater and brackish water reverse osmosis desalination

Saeid Kabiri, Mousa Meratizaman

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

Energy accounts for a large portion of the cost of reverse osmosis units, so the use of energy recovery technologies in reverse osmosis units reduces the cost of operating and utilizing these units more widely. The energy recovery devices (ERDs) such as turbochargers, Pelton wheels, Francis turbines, and pressure exchangers are among the techniques used to reduce energy consumption in these units. In this paper, a 100 m 3 /d reverse osmosis unit with seawater and brackish water feed is considered, and thermodynamic, energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, and carbon footprint analysis is performed on the reverse osmosis unit along with the energy recovery unit. The results show that the specific energy consumption (SEC) has been decreased by using ERDs and will be equal to 3.1 kWh/m 3 in sea water reverse osmosis (SWRO) with Pelton wheels, 2.74 kWh/m 3 in SWRO with turbocharger, and 2.46 kWh/m 3 in SWRO with pressure exchanger. Because of the lower energy consumption in the brackish feedwater unit, the ERD's are not effective same as seawater type. Economic analysis also shows that the amount of saved cost from connecting a pressure exchanger to a seawater reverse osmosis unit would be $0.27/m 3 . This value is the highest profitable rate among all the ERD units studied in this paper.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Energy accounts for a large portion of the cost of reverse osmosis units, so the use of energy recovery technologies in reverse osmosis units reduces the cost of operating and utilizing these units more widely. The energy recovery devices (ERDs) such as turbochargers, Pelton wheels, Francis turbines, and pressure exchangers are among the techniques used to reduce energy consumption in these units. In this paper, a 100 m 3 /d reverse osmosis unit with seawater and brackish water feed is considered, and thermodynamic, energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, and carbon footprint analysis is performed on the reverse osmosis unit along with the energy recovery unit. The results show that the specific energy consumption (SEC) has been decreased by using ERDs and will be equal to 3.1 kWh/m 3 in sea water reverse osmosis (SWRO) with Pelton wheels, 2.74 kWh/m 3 in SWRO with turbocharger, and 2.46 kWh/m 3 in SWRO with pressure exchanger. Because of the lower energy consumption in the brackish feedwater unit, the ERD's are not effective same as seawater type. Economic analysis also shows that the amount of saved cost from connecting a pressure exchanger to a seawater reverse osmosis unit would be $0.27/m 3 . This value is the highest profitable rate among all the ERD units studied in this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Energy accounts for a large portion of the cost of reverse osmosis units, so the use of energy recovery technologies in reverse osmosis units reduces the cost of operating and utilizing these units more widely. The energy recovery devices (ERDs) such as turbochargers, Pelton wheels, Francis turbines, and pressure exchangers are among the techniques used to reduce energy consumption in these units. In this paper, a 100 m 3 /d reverse osmosis unit with seawater and brackish water feed is considered, and thermodynamic, energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, and carbon footprint analysis is performed on the reverse osmosis unit along with the energy recovery unit. The results show that the specific energy consumption (SEC) has been decreased by using ERDs and will be equal to 3.1 kWh/m 3 in sea water reverse osmosis (SWRO) with Pelton wheels, 2.74 kWh/m 3 in SWRO with turbocharger, and 2.46 kWh/m 3 in SWRO with pressure exchanger. Because of the lower energy consumption in the brackish feedwater unit, the ERD's are not effective same as seawater type. Economic analysis also shows that the amount of saved cost from connecting a pressure exchanger to a seawater reverse osmosis unit would be $0.27/m 3 . This value is the highest profitable rate among all the ERD units studied in this paper.

Key concepts: Brackish water, Reverse osmosis, Exergy, Desalination, Osmotic power, Carbon footprint, Environmental science, Geothermal desalination

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and environmental (4E) and carbon footprint analysis of coupling the various energy recovery devices with seawater and brackish water reverse osmosis desalination — Research Paper | ScholarLens