2021Strategic Management ReviewRequires access

Prioritizing Research in Strategic Management: Insights from Practitioners and Academics

Saikat Chaudhuri, Michael J. Leiblein, Jeffrey J. Reuer

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

This essay presents results from a survey that assesses perceptions of academics and practitioners regarding the importance of, and their satisfaction with, research on contemporary topics in strategic management. Our objective is to provide guidance regarding important areas where respondents believe that further research would be fruitful. The responses to survey questions regarding 55 prominent research topics indicate the extent to which existing research programs have under- or over-served the demands of the academic and consultant-practitioner markets. A comparison of responses provided by academics and consultant-practitioners suggest opportunities for current academics to learn from practice. Overall, this paper provides a means to better understand the distinctive contribution of strategic management research and suggests several ways in which future research might focus its effort on questions of interest to practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This essay presents results from a survey that assesses perceptions of academics and practitioners regarding the importance of, and their satisfaction with, research on contemporary topics in strategic management. Our objective is to provide guidance regarding important areas where respondents believe that further research would be fruitful. The responses to survey questions regarding 55 prominent research topics indicate the extent to which existing research programs have under- or over-served the demands of the academic and consultant-practitioner markets. A comparison of responses provided by academics and consultant-practitioners suggest opportunities for current academics to learn from practice. Overall, this paper provides a means to better understand the distinctive contribution of strategic management research and suggests several ways in which future research might focus its effort on questions of interest to practice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This essay presents results from a survey that assesses perceptions of academics and practitioners regarding the importance of, and their satisfaction with, research on contemporary topics in strategic management. Our objective is to provide guidance regarding important areas where respondents believe that further research would be fruitful. The responses to survey questions regarding 55 prominent research topics indicate the extent to which existing research programs have under- or over-served the demands of the academic and consultant-practitioner markets. A comparison of responses provided by academics and consultant-practitioners suggest opportunities for current academics to learn from practice. Overall, this paper provides a means to better understand the distinctive contribution of strategic management research and suggests several ways in which future research might focus its effort on questions of interest to practice.

Key concepts: Business, Knowledge management, Process management, Political science, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prioritizing Research in Strategic Management: Insights from Practitioners and Academics — Research Paper | ScholarLens