ScholarLens Back to search
2020•Journal of Entomological ResearchOpen access

Evaluation of certain chickpea genotypes against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) under laboratory conditions

Lipika Pradhan, Priti Singh, S.K. Singh, Renuka Saxena

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

AbstractScreening of fifteen chickpea genotypes namely GNG-146, HC-3, PUSA-209, Digvijay, Radhey-931, Annegiri, PBG-5, PUSA-261, HC-10, CSJD-884, GCP-101, RSG-10, RSG-931, L-550 and C-235 were conducted to quantify the losses caused by pulse beetle. The results revealed that the mean per cent of seed damage varied from 33.92 to 47.92% and mean per cent weight loss of chickpea seeds varied from 37.99 to 64.00%. The mean per cent seed damage was highest in the genotype HC-10 (47.92%) and lowest in Digvijay (33.92%). The genotype HC-10 (64.00%) recorded maximum per cent weight loss whereas; the genotype Digvijay recorded minimum per cent weight loss (37.99%). Among all the 15 genotypes; resistant genotype was Digvijay followed by CSJD-884, RSG-931, GNG-146, Radhey-931, L-550 and GCP-101. Most susceptible genotype was HC-10 followed by PUSA-261, RSG-10, HC-3, PBG-5, C-235, Annegiri and PUSA-209.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AbstractScreening of fifteen chickpea genotypes namely GNG-146, HC-3, PUSA-209, Digvijay, Radhey-931, Annegiri, PBG-5, PUSA-261, HC-10, CSJD-884, GCP-101, RSG-10, RSG-931, L-550 and C-235 were conducted to quantify the losses caused by pulse beetle. The results revealed that the mean per cent of seed damage varied from 33.92 to 47.92% and mean per cent weight loss of chickpea seeds varied from 37.99 to 64.00%. The mean per cent seed damage was highest in the genotype HC-10 (47.92%) and lowest in Digvijay (33.92%). The genotype HC-10 (64.00%) recorded maximum per cent weight loss whereas; the genotype Digvijay recorded minimum per cent weight loss (37.99%). Among all the 15 genotypes; resistant genotype was Digvijay followed by CSJD-884, RSG-931, GNG-146, Radhey-931, L-550 and GCP-101. Most susceptible genotype was HC-10 followed by PUSA-261, RSG-10, HC-3, PBG-5, C-235, Annegiri and PUSA-209.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AbstractScreening of fifteen chickpea genotypes namely GNG-146, HC-3, PUSA-209, Digvijay, Radhey-931, Annegiri, PBG-5, PUSA-261, HC-10, CSJD-884, GCP-101, RSG-10, RSG-931, L-550 and C-235 were conducted to quantify the losses caused by pulse beetle. The results revealed that the mean per cent of seed damage varied from 33.92 to 47.92% and mean per cent weight loss of chickpea seeds varied from 37.99 to 64.00%. The mean per cent seed damage was highest in the genotype HC-10 (47.92%) and lowest in Digvijay (33.92%). The genotype HC-10 (64.00%) recorded maximum per cent weight loss whereas; the genotype Digvijay recorded minimum per cent weight loss (37.99%). Among all the 15 genotypes; resistant genotype was Digvijay followed by CSJD-884, RSG-931, GNG-146, Radhey-931, L-550 and GCP-101. Most susceptible genotype was HC-10 followed by PUSA-261, RSG-10, HC-3, PBG-5, C-235, Annegiri and PUSA-209.

Key concepts: Callosobruchus chinensis, Pulse (music), Biology, Veterinary medicine, Genotype, Agronomy, Horticulture, Medicine

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of certain chickpea genotypes against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) under laboratory conditions — Research Paper | ScholarLens