2021Journal of Great Lakes ResearchOpen access

Effect of the urbanized embayment Toronto Harbour on the composition and production of zooplankton

Kelly L. Bowen, Warren J. S. Currie

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

To better understand zooplankton dynamics in Lake Ontario’s Toronto Harbour and adjacent coastal area (CA), we sampled zooplankton, phytoplankton, nutrients and physical parameters on six dates in 2016. Despite higher levels of nutrients, chlorophyll and primary production in the inner harbor (IH), the areas supported similar May to November zooplankton biomass (IH = 32 ± 7 and CA = 42 ± 10 mg/m3). IH values were much lower than other nutrient-enriched embayments in Lake Ontario, yet CA biomass was twice that of nearshore sites away from Toronto. Small zooplankton such as rotifers and Bosmina dominated IH; and large taxa (Daphnia, calanoids and predatory cladocerans) were more important in the CA. Daphnia, Bosmina, cyclopoids and calanoids were larger in the CA, and adult cyclopoids had higher egg ratios. This led to low annual IH production estimates for both cyclopoid and calanoid copepods. Total phosphorus and chlorophyll did not appear to regulate zooplankton biomass, but positive relationships were found with bacterial biomass in the IH and with temperature in the cool season. Atypically high fish planktivory rates likely suppressed larger IH zooplankton in 2016, allowing small, resilient Bosmina to flourish and contribute 84% of total production in the IH. Comparing 2016 data to previous zooplankton surveys revealed considerable inter-annual variation in proportions of Daphnia, Bosmina and predatory cladocerans over the 1994 to 2016 period, and the strong top-down controls observed in 2016 were not typical. Elevated microbial production may serve as an important alternate trophic pathway supporting cladoceran populations in Toronto Harbour.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To better understand zooplankton dynamics in Lake Ontario’s Toronto Harbour and adjacent coastal area (CA), we sampled zooplankton, phytoplankton, nutrients and physical parameters on six dates in 2016. Despite higher levels of nutrients, chlorophyll and primary production in the inner harbor (IH), the areas supported similar May to November zooplankton biomass (IH = 32 ± 7 and CA = 42 ± 10 mg/m3). IH values were much lower than other nutrient-enriched embayments in Lake Ontario, yet CA biomass was twice that of nearshore sites away from Toronto. Small zooplankton such as rotifers and Bosmina dominated IH; and large taxa (Daphnia, calanoids and predatory cladocerans) were more important in the CA. Daphnia, Bosmina, cyclopoids and calanoids were larger in the CA, and adult cyclopoids had higher egg ratios. This led to low annual IH production estimates for both cyclopoid and calanoid copepods. Total phosphorus and chlorophyll did not appear to regulate zooplankton biomass, but positive relationships were found with bacterial biomass in the IH and with temperature in the cool season. Atypically high fish planktivory rates likely suppressed larger IH zooplankton in 2016, allowing small, resilient Bosmina to flourish and contribute 84% of total production in the IH. Comparing 2016 data to previous zooplankton surveys revealed considerable inter-annual variation in proportions of Daphnia, Bosmina and predatory cladocerans over the 1994 to 2016 period, and the strong top-down controls observed in 2016 were not typical. Elevated microbial production may serve as an important alternate trophic pathway supporting cladoceran populations in Toronto Harbour.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To better understand zooplankton dynamics in Lake Ontario’s Toronto Harbour and adjacent coastal area (CA), we sampled zooplankton, phytoplankton, nutrients and physical parameters on six dates in 2016. Despite higher levels of nutrients, chlorophyll and primary production in the inner harbor (IH), the areas supported similar May to November zooplankton biomass (IH = 32 ± 7 and CA = 42 ± 10 mg/m3). IH values were much lower than other nutrient-enriched embayments in Lake Ontario, yet CA biomass was twice that of nearshore sites away from Toronto. Small zooplankton such as rotifers and Bosmina dominated IH; and large taxa (Daphnia, calanoids and predatory cladocerans) were more important in the CA. Daphnia, Bosmina, cyclopoids and calanoids were larger in the CA, and adult cyclopoids had higher egg ratios. This led to low annual IH production estimates for both cyclopoid and calanoid copepods. Total phosphorus and chlorophyll did not appear to regulate zooplankton biomass, but positive relationships were found with bacterial biomass in the IH and with temperature in the cool season. Atypically high fish planktivory rates likely suppressed larger IH zooplankton in 2016, allowing small, resilient Bosmina to flourish and contribute 84% of total production in the IH. Comparing 2016 data to previous zooplankton surveys revealed considerable inter-annual variation in proportions of Daphnia, Bosmina and predatory cladocerans over the 1994 to 2016 period, and the strong top-down controls observed in 2016 were not typical. Elevated microbial production may serve as an important alternate trophic pathway supporting cladoceran populations in Toronto Harbour.

Key concepts: Bosmina, Zooplankton, Daphnia, Biomass (ecology), Trophic level, Biology, Ecology, Phytoplankton

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of the urbanized embayment Toronto Harbour on the composition and production of zooplankton — Research Paper | ScholarLens