2001Unpublished venueRequires access

Understanding Tax Reform in Minnesota

Laura Kalambokidis, Terrance M. Hurley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Minnesota is in the midst of a wave of interest in reforming the state tax system. In response to taxpayer input gathered at numerous public meetings, the Minnesota Department of Revenue (DOR) has developed proposals designed to make the tax system fairer, simpler, and more favorable to prosperity. Governor Ventura has proposed that the state 1) shifts K–12 education funding away from local property taxes to some other tax, 2) reduces income-tax rates, and 3) lowers the rate and broadens the base of the sales tax. The Citizens’ League has recommended that property-tax relief be more carefully targeted to low-income households. Finally, Minnesota has joined 38 other states in seeking to simplify general sales taxes and to adopt a model sales-tax system. It seems that every major component of the state tax system is being considered for reform, including the sales tax, property tax, corporate franchise tax, and individual income tax. For each tax, numerous options are on the table. How are Minnesota taxpayers to understand and assess the array of possible outcomes of the reform process? This article will explain some of the options and provide some guidance for evaluating tax-reform proposals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Minnesota is in the midst of a wave of interest in reforming the state tax system. In response to taxpayer input gathered at numerous public meetings, the Minnesota Department of Revenue (DOR) has developed proposals designed to make the tax system fairer, simpler, and more favorable to prosperity. Governor Ventura has proposed that the state 1) shifts K–12 education funding away from local property taxes to some other tax, 2) reduces income-tax rates, and 3) lowers the rate and broadens the base of the sales tax. The Citizens’ League has recommended that property-tax relief be more carefully targeted to low-income households. Finally, Minnesota has joined 38 other states in seeking to simplify general sales taxes and to adopt a model sales-tax system. It seems that every major component of the state tax system is being considered for reform, including the sales tax, property tax, corporate franchise tax, and individual income tax. For each tax, numerous options are on the table. How are Minnesota taxpayers to understand and assess the array of possible outcomes of the reform process? This article will explain some of the options and provide some guidance for evaluating tax-reform proposals.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Minnesota is in the midst of a wave of interest in reforming the state tax system. In response to taxpayer input gathered at numerous public meetings, the Minnesota Department of Revenue (DOR) has developed proposals designed to make the tax system fairer, simpler, and more favorable to prosperity. Governor Ventura has proposed that the state 1) shifts K–12 education funding away from local property taxes to some other tax, 2) reduces income-tax rates, and 3) lowers the rate and broadens the base of the sales tax. The Citizens’ League has recommended that property-tax relief be more carefully targeted to low-income households. Finally, Minnesota has joined 38 other states in seeking to simplify general sales taxes and to adopt a model sales-tax system. It seems that every major component of the state tax system is being considered for reform, including the sales tax, property tax, corporate franchise tax, and individual income tax. For each tax, numerous options are on the table. How are Minnesota taxpayers to understand and assess the array of possible outcomes of the reform process? This article will explain some of the options and provide some guidance for evaluating tax-reform proposals.

Key concepts: Tax reform, Sales tax, Value-added tax, Indirect tax, Ad valorem tax, State income tax, Tax credit, Tax avoidance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Understanding Tax Reform in Minnesota — Research Paper | ScholarLens