2020PubMedOpen access

[The new AIRM guidelines for workers exposed to electromagnetic fields: health surveillance and fit for work judgment].

Roberto Moccaldi

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY: This report illustrates some points relating to the health surveillance of workers exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMF) contained in the new Guidelines on EMFs. A working group from AIRM (Italian Association of Medical Radiation Protection) is currently implementing these guidelines. The report focus in particular on two specific aspects, critical to set up and carry out a correct Health Surveillance (HS): 1. Identification of the exposed workers (who will undergo Health Surveillance). 2. Health Surveillance contents. Considering the peculiar characteristic of the agents at risk, the identification of workers to undergo health surveillance (not specified in the legislation), should involve an assessment of the exposure levels as well as the specific health condition of each "worker at particular risk". Health surveillance programs, to be applied in case of greater exposure, will be focus on identifying sensitive risk groups who should undergo more frequent health checks.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SUMMARY: This report illustrates some points relating to the health surveillance of workers exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMF) contained in the new Guidelines on EMFs. A working group from AIRM (Italian Association of Medical Radiation Protection) is currently implementing these guidelines. The report focus in particular on two specific aspects, critical to set up and carry out a correct Health Surveillance (HS): 1. Identification of the exposed workers (who will undergo Health Surveillance). 2. Health Surveillance contents. Considering the peculiar characteristic of the agents at risk, the identification of workers to undergo health surveillance (not specified in the legislation), should involve an assessment of the exposure levels as well as the specific health condition of each "worker at particular risk". Health surveillance programs, to be applied in case of greater exposure, will be focus on identifying sensitive risk groups who should undergo more frequent health checks.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SUMMARY: This report illustrates some points relating to the health surveillance of workers exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMF) contained in the new Guidelines on EMFs. A working group from AIRM (Italian Association of Medical Radiation Protection) is currently implementing these guidelines. The report focus in particular on two specific aspects, critical to set up and carry out a correct Health Surveillance (HS): 1. Identification of the exposed workers (who will undergo Health Surveillance). 2. Health Surveillance contents. Considering the peculiar characteristic of the agents at risk, the identification of workers to undergo health surveillance (not specified in the legislation), should involve an assessment of the exposure levels as well as the specific health condition of each "worker at particular risk". Health surveillance programs, to be applied in case of greater exposure, will be focus on identifying sensitive risk groups who should undergo more frequent health checks.

Key concepts: Health surveillance, Medical surveillance, Environmental health, Occupational safety and health, Identification (biology), Work (physics), Health protection, Legislation

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The new AIRM guidelines for workers exposed to electromagnetic fields: health surveillance and fit for work judgment]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens