2021Unpublished venueRequires access

Local space building as state building?

Jenni Merovuo

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The Russo-Swedish border of 1743 was incoherent in practice and vague even on paper. The process of attempting to divide the congregations that were crossing the border reveals the spatiality of the state building process. Continuing communal practices, despite the new state border in the middle of the community, alone exposes the contradiction between state territory and local space. The clergy held a central position in the local community, and the priests had a visible role in arranging the local circumstances on the borderland. The chapter focuses on the clergy&s;s agency via the parson Zacharias Cygnaeus of the Mantyharju Congregation. The Mantyharju congregation remained under the jurisdiction of the Borga Chapter, although the church and the parsonage stood on the Russian side. The Borga Chapter appointed the priests from the Swedish side, but the Consistory of Fredrikshamn still had influence on the Russian side of the parish.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Russo-Swedish border of 1743 was incoherent in practice and vague even on paper. The process of attempting to divide the congregations that were crossing the border reveals the spatiality of the state building process. Continuing communal practices, despite the new state border in the middle of the community, alone exposes the contradiction between state territory and local space. The clergy held a central position in the local community, and the priests had a visible role in arranging the local circumstances on the borderland. The chapter focuses on the clergy&s;s agency via the parson Zacharias Cygnaeus of the Mantyharju Congregation. The Mantyharju congregation remained under the jurisdiction of the Borga Chapter, although the church and the parsonage stood on the Russian side. The Borga Chapter appointed the priests from the Swedish side, but the Consistory of Fredrikshamn still had influence on the Russian side of the parish.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Russo-Swedish border of 1743 was incoherent in practice and vague even on paper. The process of attempting to divide the congregations that were crossing the border reveals the spatiality of the state building process. Continuing communal practices, despite the new state border in the middle of the community, alone exposes the contradiction between state territory and local space. The clergy held a central position in the local community, and the priests had a visible role in arranging the local circumstances on the borderland. The chapter focuses on the clergy&s;s agency via the parson Zacharias Cygnaeus of the Mantyharju Congregation. The Mantyharju congregation remained under the jurisdiction of the Borga Chapter, although the church and the parsonage stood on the Russian side. The Borga Chapter appointed the priests from the Swedish side, but the Consistory of Fredrikshamn still had influence on the Russian side of the parish.

Key concepts: Jurisdiction, State (computer science), Contradiction, Agency (philosophy), Political science, Space (punctuation), Sociology, Position (finance)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Local space building as state building? — Research Paper | ScholarLens