Laing’s The Divided Self and The Politics of Experience : then and now
Douglas Kirsner
Abstract
Douglas Kirsner
Abstract
The Divided Self and The Politics of Experience are two very different books. The first is a careful, clinical existential study of schizophrenia whereas the second is an impassioned condemnation of the way modern society has thwarted and violated human experience. Laing brought the idea of politics to experience, and as well as to relationships, the family and other interconnected social contexts. But both books, which I want to revisit, show very important similarities that illuminate central features of Laing’s existential quest.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The Divided Self and The Politics of Experience are two very different books. The first is a careful, clinical existential study of schizophrenia whereas the second is an impassioned condemnation of the way modern society has thwarted and violated human experience. Laing brought the idea of politics to experience, and as well as to relationships, the family and other interconnected social contexts. But both books, which I want to revisit, show very important similarities that illuminate central features of Laing’s existential quest.
Key concepts: Existentialism, Politics, Psychoanalysis, Sociology, Epistemology, Psychology, Social psychology, Political science