2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Rubber mill wastewater treatment using sequence batchReactor in aerobic condition

Caesar Bidal Clement Peter, Caesar Bidal

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

A sequencing batch reactor (SBR) has certain advantages over conventional activated sludge processes (ASP) for the treatment of Rubber mill wastewater. The performance of a sequencing batch reactor in treating rubber mill wastewater effluents was investigated with a suspended biomass configuration and operating under aerobic conditions. Two reactors were used in this study with varying organic loading rates (OLR) and Hydraulic retention time (HRT). A total sequence of 24 h (15 min: filling phase; 23 h: reaction phase (aeration with recirculation); 30 min: setting; and 15 min: withdrawal) was employed and studied with various organic loading rates (0.047 kg COD/m3/day and 0.0933 kg COD/m3/day for reactor 1) and (0.1399 kg COD/m3/day and 0.1866 kg COD/m3/day for reactor 2). The SBR performance was assessed by means of Chemical oxygen demand (COD), Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), Zinc, Nitrogen removal and operational parameters such as pH, sludge volume (SV), suspended solids (SS) and volatile suspended solids (VSS), which were monitored during the reactors operation. The SBR showed relatively more efficient performance in treating the rubber wastewater about 81.24% and 74.81% COD respectively was removed and 91% and 90% BOD respectively was removed. A final zinc concentration of 0.4 mg/L and 0.98 mg/L were achieved in reactor 1 and 2 respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A sequencing batch reactor (SBR) has certain advantages over conventional activated sludge processes (ASP) for the treatment of Rubber mill wastewater. The performance of a sequencing batch reactor in treating rubber mill wastewater effluents was investigated with a suspended biomass configuration and operating under aerobic conditions. Two reactors were used in this study with varying organic loading rates (OLR) and Hydraulic retention time (HRT). A total sequence of 24 h (15 min: filling phase; 23 h: reaction phase (aeration with recirculation); 30 min: setting; and 15 min: withdrawal) was employed and studied with various organic loading rates (0.047 kg COD/m3/day and 0.0933 kg COD/m3/day for reactor 1) and (0.1399 kg COD/m3/day and 0.1866 kg COD/m3/day for reactor 2). The SBR performance was assessed by means of Chemical oxygen demand (COD), Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), Zinc, Nitrogen removal and operational parameters such as pH, sludge volume (SV), suspended solids (SS) and volatile suspended solids (VSS), which were monitored during the reactors operation. The SBR showed relatively more efficient performance in treating the rubber wastewater about 81.24% and 74.81% COD respectively was removed and 91% and 90% BOD respectively was removed. A final zinc concentration of 0.4 mg/L and 0.98 mg/L were achieved in reactor 1 and 2 respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A sequencing batch reactor (SBR) has certain advantages over conventional activated sludge processes (ASP) for the treatment of Rubber mill wastewater. The performance of a sequencing batch reactor in treating rubber mill wastewater effluents was investigated with a suspended biomass configuration and operating under aerobic conditions. Two reactors were used in this study with varying organic loading rates (OLR) and Hydraulic retention time (HRT). A total sequence of 24 h (15 min: filling phase; 23 h: reaction phase (aeration with recirculation); 30 min: setting; and 15 min: withdrawal) was employed and studied with various organic loading rates (0.047 kg COD/m3/day and 0.0933 kg COD/m3/day for reactor 1) and (0.1399 kg COD/m3/day and 0.1866 kg COD/m3/day for reactor 2). The SBR performance was assessed by means of Chemical oxygen demand (COD), Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), Zinc, Nitrogen removal and operational parameters such as pH, sludge volume (SV), suspended solids (SS) and volatile suspended solids (VSS), which were monitored during the reactors operation. The SBR showed relatively more efficient performance in treating the rubber wastewater about 81.24% and 74.81% COD respectively was removed and 91% and 90% BOD respectively was removed. A final zinc concentration of 0.4 mg/L and 0.98 mg/L were achieved in reactor 1 and 2 respectively.

Key concepts: Sequencing batch reactor, Chemical oxygen demand, Wastewater, Effluent, Total suspended solids, Aeration, Biochemical oxygen demand, Pulp and paper industry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rubber mill wastewater treatment using sequence batchReactor in aerobic condition — Research Paper | ScholarLens