Post-soviet party of power: the «United Russia» in a comparative context
Борис Макаренко
Abstract
Борис Макаренко
Abstract
It is the phenomenon of dominant party in transitional societies that is considered in the article: the dominant parties’ common features, their main types and their functions in a given political system. In such comparativistic context, the author presents specific characteristics of the dominant parties in the post-Soviet states (he distinguishes them as a specific type, suggesting to raise the journalistic cliche “party of power” into the status of a political-science term, in order to bring it out). Further on, the author retraces in detail the evolution, the programmatico-political positioning and the functions of the “United Russia” party and comes to the conclusion that the tasks of Russia’s modernization demand qualitative renewal of this party.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It is the phenomenon of dominant party in transitional societies that is considered in the article: the dominant parties’ common features, their main types and their functions in a given political system. In such comparativistic context, the author presents specific characteristics of the dominant parties in the post-Soviet states (he distinguishes them as a specific type, suggesting to raise the journalistic cliche “party of power” into the status of a political-science term, in order to bring it out). Further on, the author retraces in detail the evolution, the programmatico-political positioning and the functions of the “United Russia” party and comes to the conclusion that the tasks of Russia’s modernization demand qualitative renewal of this party.
Key concepts: Cliché, Modernization theory, Politics, Political science, Context (archaeology), Power (physics), Phenomenon, Political economy