2021•Sabiedrība un kultūra rakstu krājums = Society and Culture conference proceedingsRequires access

Laiks. Mīlestība. Smiekli

Ināra Leikuma

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article describes and comments on the notions of time, love and laughter. When thinking about the eras and their characteristics, initially there is a hypothesis that time, love and laughter are self-sufficiently functioning phenomena that cannot be subdued by mind or artificially created and socialized. However, during this study it was concluded that the understanding and interpretation of these phenomena is significantly influenced by the traditions, values and morality of the era. The article accentuates the subjective nature of love and laughter. But this raises the question if these phenomena can be scientifically researched and if it is necessary to do that at all. Answering this question, the article deals with the studies on time classification and with insights of philosophers and psychologists on laughter and love. In the study, the author explores a less widely viewed aspect of the relationship between love and laughter and the question if love can be ridiculous. For illustration purposes, the materials from humour magazines published in Latvia in the early 19th century are employed. As a result, it is concluded that love in itself is neither tragic nor ridiculous. It all depends on how it is interpreted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article describes and comments on the notions of time, love and laughter. When thinking about the eras and their characteristics, initially there is a hypothesis that time, love and laughter are self-sufficiently functioning phenomena that cannot be subdued by mind or artificially created and socialized. However, during this study it was concluded that the understanding and interpretation of these phenomena is significantly influenced by the traditions, values and morality of the era. The article accentuates the subjective nature of love and laughter. But this raises the question if these phenomena can be scientifically researched and if it is necessary to do that at all. Answering this question, the article deals with the studies on time classification and with insights of philosophers and psychologists on laughter and love. In the study, the author explores a less widely viewed aspect of the relationship between love and laughter and the question if love can be ridiculous. For illustration purposes, the materials from humour magazines published in Latvia in the early 19th century are employed. As a result, it is concluded that love in itself is neither tragic nor ridiculous. It all depends on how it is interpreted.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article describes and comments on the notions of time, love and laughter. When thinking about the eras and their characteristics, initially there is a hypothesis that time, love and laughter are self-sufficiently functioning phenomena that cannot be subdued by mind or artificially created and socialized. However, during this study it was concluded that the understanding and interpretation of these phenomena is significantly influenced by the traditions, values and morality of the era. The article accentuates the subjective nature of love and laughter. But this raises the question if these phenomena can be scientifically researched and if it is necessary to do that at all. Answering this question, the article deals with the studies on time classification and with insights of philosophers and psychologists on laughter and love. In the study, the author explores a less widely viewed aspect of the relationship between love and laughter and the question if love can be ridiculous. For illustration purposes, the materials from humour magazines published in Latvia in the early 19th century are employed. As a result, it is concluded that love in itself is neither tragic nor ridiculous. It all depends on how it is interpreted.

Key concepts: Ridiculous, Laughter, Interpretation (philosophy), Morality, Psychology, Epistemology, Aesthetics, Psychoanalysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Laiks. Mīlestība. Smiekli — Research Paper | ScholarLens