2020Unpublished venueRequires access

EFFECTIVENESS OF MICROBAT (STERIGARD) HANDRUB AND MICROGUARD (STERIGARD) HAND DISINFECTANT FROM IMAGO & GETTER FOR REDUCTION OF INFECTION IN ANY FACILITY

Imran Khan Memon, Tahur Shaikh, Idris Khan, Surjeet Samanta, Romil Dagha, Komal Kumari

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization, and other health experts promote hand hygiene as the most important hygiene measure in preventing the spread of infection from any facility. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers are widely used for achieving hand hygiene. The use of hand sanitizer and disinfects result sustained improvement in hand-hygiene compliance, coinciding with a reduction of many resistant and prone infections. The study aimed at determining the efficacy of Microbat (Sterigard) hand rub and Microguard (Sterigard) Hand disinfectant by ASTM E2755 method which included 6 different volunteers for the test procedure. The results showed more than log 4 reduction for bacteria, yeast and molds. This proves the efficacy of both Microbat (Sterigard) hand rub and Microguard (Sterigard) Hand disinfection and should be considered for regular usage for achieving aseptic environment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization, and other health experts promote hand hygiene as the most important hygiene measure in preventing the spread of infection from any facility. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers are widely used for achieving hand hygiene. The use of hand sanitizer and disinfects result sustained improvement in hand-hygiene compliance, coinciding with a reduction of many resistant and prone infections. The study aimed at determining the efficacy of Microbat (Sterigard) hand rub and Microguard (Sterigard) Hand disinfectant by ASTM E2755 method which included 6 different volunteers for the test procedure. The results showed more than log 4 reduction for bacteria, yeast and molds. This proves the efficacy of both Microbat (Sterigard) hand rub and Microguard (Sterigard) Hand disinfection and should be considered for regular usage for achieving aseptic environment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization, and other health experts promote hand hygiene as the most important hygiene measure in preventing the spread of infection from any facility. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers are widely used for achieving hand hygiene. The use of hand sanitizer and disinfects result sustained improvement in hand-hygiene compliance, coinciding with a reduction of many resistant and prone infections. The study aimed at determining the efficacy of Microbat (Sterigard) hand rub and Microguard (Sterigard) Hand disinfectant by ASTM E2755 method which included 6 different volunteers for the test procedure. The results showed more than log 4 reduction for bacteria, yeast and molds. This proves the efficacy of both Microbat (Sterigard) hand rub and Microguard (Sterigard) Hand disinfection and should be considered for regular usage for achieving aseptic environment.

Key concepts: Hand sanitizer, Hygiene, Disinfectant, Hand washing, Infection control, Medicine, Intensive care medicine, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EFFECTIVENESS OF MICROBAT (STERIGARD) HANDRUB AND MICROGUARD (STERIGARD) HAND DISINFECTANT FROM IMAGO & GETTER FOR REDUCTION OF INFECTION IN ANY FACILITY — Research Paper | ScholarLens