2005Unpublished venueOpen access

Should developing countries participate in the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol . The low-hanging fruits and baseline issues

Marc Germain, Alphonse Magnus, Vincent van Steenberghe

Open full text 36 citations

Abstract

Under the Kyoto Protocol, industrialized countries committed to emission reductions may fufffil part of their obligations by implementing emission reduction projects in developing countries. In doing so, they make use of the so-called Clean Development\nMechanism (CDM). Two important issues surround the implementation of the CDM. First, if the cheapest abatement measures are implemented for CDM projects, developing countries may be left with only more expensive measures when they have to meet\ntheir own commitments in the future (the so-called low-hanging fruits issue). Second, a choice must be made on the type of baseline against which emission reductions are measured: an absolute baseline or a relative (to output) one (the baseline issue). The purpose of this paper is to study the interactions between these two issues from the\npoint of view of the developing country. Two major results are obtained. First, when possible future commitments for developing countries and irreversibility of abatement measures are taken into account, we show that the industry where CDM projects are\nimplemented enjoys larger profits under an absolute baseline than under a relative one. Second, concerning the low-hanging fruits problem, the financial compensation required by the developing country for implementing "too many" CDMprojects is larger\nunder the relative baseline.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Under the Kyoto Protocol, industrialized countries committed to emission reductions may fufffil part of their obligations by implementing emission reduction projects in developing countries. In doing so, they make use of the so-called Clean Development\nMechanism (CDM). Two important issues surround the implementation of the CDM. First, if the cheapest abatement measures are implemented for CDM projects, developing countries may be left with only more expensive measures when they have to meet\ntheir own commitments in the future (the so-called low-hanging fruits issue). Second, a choice must be made on the type of baseline against which emission reductions are measured: an absolute baseline or a relative (to output) one (the baseline issue). The purpose of this paper is to study the interactions between these two issues from the\npoint of view of the developing country. Two major results are obtained. First, when possible future commitments for developing countries and irreversibility of abatement measures are taken into account, we show that the industry where CDM projects are\nimplemented enjoys larger profits under an absolute baseline than under a relative one. Second, concerning the low-hanging fruits problem, the financial compensation required by the developing country for implementing "too many" CDMprojects is larger\nunder the relative baseline.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Under the Kyoto Protocol, industrialized countries committed to emission reductions may fufffil part of their obligations by implementing emission reduction projects in developing countries. In doing so, they make use of the so-called Clean Development\nMechanism (CDM). Two important issues surround the implementation of the CDM. First, if the cheapest abatement measures are implemented for CDM projects, developing countries may be left with only more expensive measures when they have to meet\ntheir own commitments in the future (the so-called low-hanging fruits issue). Second, a choice must be made on the type of baseline against which emission reductions are measured: an absolute baseline or a relative (to output) one (the baseline issue). The purpose of this paper is to study the interactions between these two issues from the\npoint of view of the developing country. Two major results are obtained. First, when possible future commitments for developing countries and irreversibility of abatement measures are taken into account, we show that the industry where CDM projects are\nimplemented enjoys larger profits under an absolute baseline than under a relative one. Second, concerning the low-hanging fruits problem, the financial compensation required by the developing country for implementing "too many" CDMprojects is larger\nunder the relative baseline.

Key concepts: Baseline (sea), Kyoto Protocol, Clean Development Mechanism, Developing country, Protocol (science), Business, Environmental economics, Point (geometry)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Should developing countries participate in the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol . The low-hanging fruits and baseline issues — Research Paper | ScholarLens