2009Oxford Bulletin of Economics and StatisticsOpen access

A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments *

David Roodman

Open full text 5,098 citations

Abstract

Abstract The difference and system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators are growing in popularity. As implemented in popular software, the estimators easily generate instruments that are numerous and, in system GMM, potentially suspect. A large instrument collection overfits endogenous variables even as it weakens the Hansen test of the instruments’ joint validity. This paper reviews the evidence on the effects of instrument proliferation, and describes and simulates simple ways to control it. It illustrates the dangers by replicating Forbes [ American Economic Review (2000) Vol. 90, pp. 869–887] on income inequality and Levine et al. [ Journal of Monetary Economics ] (2000) Vol. 46, pp. 31–77] on financial sector development. Results in both papers appear driven by previously undetected endogeneity.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The difference and system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators are growing in popularity. As implemented in popular software, the estimators easily generate instruments that are numerous and, in system GMM, potentially suspect. A large instrument collection overfits endogenous variables even as it weakens the Hansen test of the instruments’ joint validity. This paper reviews the evidence on the effects of instrument proliferation, and describes and simulates simple ways to control it. It illustrates the dangers by replicating Forbes [ American Economic Review (2000) Vol. 90, pp. 869–887] on income inequality and Levine et al. [ Journal of Monetary Economics ] (2000) Vol. 46, pp. 31–77] on financial sector development. Results in both papers appear driven by previously undetected endogeneity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5098 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The difference and system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators are growing in popularity. As implemented in popular software, the estimators easily generate instruments that are numerous and, in system GMM, potentially suspect. A large instrument collection overfits endogenous variables even as it weakens the Hansen test of the instruments’ joint validity. This paper reviews the evidence on the effects of instrument proliferation, and describes and simulates simple ways to control it. It illustrates the dangers by replicating Forbes [ American Economic Review (2000) Vol. 90, pp. 869–887] on income inequality and Levine et al. [ Journal of Monetary Economics ] (2000) Vol. 46, pp. 31–77] on financial sector development. Results in both papers appear driven by previously undetected endogeneity.

Key concepts: Endogeneity, Generalized method of moments, Popularity, Estimator, Econometrics, Suspect, Instrumental variable, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments * — Research Paper | ScholarLens