2013Unpublished venueRequires access

The paradox of management control (PMC)

Marcelo Francini Girão Barroso, Fábio Frezatti

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

We call the Paradox of Management Control (PMC) an idea suggested by Hopwood (1974, Accounting and human behaviour, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall) that managers would actually achieve less overall control within the organisation as a result of using an ever increasing number of individual controls. In this essay we explore this suggestion, briefly in regard to how it is treated within management control literature but towards an alternative explanation for it. A discourse-theory based approach is developed in order to conclude that this paradox in inherent within social orders exercising the logic of management control. The commonly accepted structuralist assumption about the empirical possibility for a complete system of signification – which would in turn deem non-paradoxical control systems possible – supports political endeavours within the organisation in favour of specific interested parties. We want to highlight the effect of such unobserved assumption upon the developments of organisational social logics. Thus, we suggest that most of the problems related to management control and to the use of control artefacts have as primary reason the assumption about the possibility of fullness. We call it a paradigmatic problem, for the paradigm that sustains both researchers’ and practitioners’ rationale about organisations and management control happens to strengthen hegemonic discourses articulated by interested parties within the social order in detriment of everyone else. Management control, in this sense, is constituted as an object within the organisational field out of the articulatory practices performed by the interacting people. It is not a naive interaction though, but a set of hegemonic practices, i.e. politically inflected endeavours through which specific discourses are raised hegemonic. Hence, more than discussing the impactedness of management control or the design of management control systems, we should be dealing with the primacy of politics inherent within the articulation of management control within organisations

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We call the Paradox of Management Control (PMC) an idea suggested by Hopwood (1974, Accounting and human behaviour, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall) that managers would actually achieve less overall control within the organisation as a result of using an ever increasing number of individual controls. In this essay we explore this suggestion, briefly in regard to how it is treated within management control literature but towards an alternative explanation for it. A discourse-theory based approach is developed in order to conclude that this paradox in inherent within social orders exercising the logic of management control. The commonly accepted structuralist assumption about the empirical possibility for a complete system of signification – which would in turn deem non-paradoxical control systems possible – supports political endeavours within the organisation in favour of specific interested parties. We want to highlight the effect of such unobserved assumption upon the developments of organisational social logics. Thus, we suggest that most of the problems related to management control and to the use of control artefacts have as primary reason the assumption about the possibility of fullness. We call it a paradigmatic problem, for the paradigm that sustains both researchers’ and practitioners’ rationale about organisations and management control happens to strengthen hegemonic discourses articulated by interested parties within the social order in detriment of everyone else. Management control, in this sense, is constituted as an object within the organisational field out of the articulatory practices performed by the interacting people. It is not a naive interaction though, but a set of hegemonic practices, i.e. politically inflected endeavours through which specific discourses are raised hegemonic. Hence, more than discussing the impactedness of management control or the design of management control systems, we should be dealing with the primacy of politics inherent within the articulation of management control within organisations

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We call the Paradox of Management Control (PMC) an idea suggested by Hopwood (1974, Accounting and human behaviour, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall) that managers would actually achieve less overall control within the organisation as a result of using an ever increasing number of individual controls. In this essay we explore this suggestion, briefly in regard to how it is treated within management control literature but towards an alternative explanation for it. A discourse-theory based approach is developed in order to conclude that this paradox in inherent within social orders exercising the logic of management control. The commonly accepted structuralist assumption about the empirical possibility for a complete system of signification – which would in turn deem non-paradoxical control systems possible – supports political endeavours within the organisation in favour of specific interested parties. We want to highlight the effect of such unobserved assumption upon the developments of organisational social logics. Thus, we suggest that most of the problems related to management control and to the use of control artefacts have as primary reason the assumption about the possibility of fullness. We call it a paradigmatic problem, for the paradigm that sustains both researchers’ and practitioners’ rationale about organisations and management control happens to strengthen hegemonic discourses articulated by interested parties within the social order in detriment of everyone else. Management control, in this sense, is constituted as an object within the organisational field out of the articulatory practices performed by the interacting people. It is not a naive interaction though, but a set of hegemonic practices, i.e. politically inflected endeavours through which specific discourses are raised hegemonic. Hence, more than discussing the impactedness of management control or the design of management control systems, we should be dealing with the primacy of politics inherent within the articulation of management control within organisations

Key concepts: Hegemony, Management control system, Control (management), Politics, Order (exchange), Field (mathematics), Sociology, Set (abstract data type)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The paradox of management control (PMC) — Research Paper | ScholarLens