Law and Interdisciplinarity: On the Inevitable Normativity of Legal Studies
J.M.M. Smits
Abstract
J.M.M. Smits
Abstract
The field of legal studies is undergoing rapid changes of a highly diverse nature. Increasing specialization, globalization, the rise of interdisciplinary legal studies, and a growing separation of legal research and teaching prompt the question: What is the aim and method of legal studies? The approach advocated in this article provides a contextual model of legal scholarship. Its most important feature is that the basis for autonomous legal studies lies in the fact that it offers a method of analysis. Legal studies look at the world through the lens of what people ought to do in law. This puts “Law and …” approaches in context: it is impossible to carry out meaningful interdisciplinary work in the law without giving center stage to the question of what the law ought to be. This article explores the consequences of this “inevitable normativity” of legal studies for future academic research and teaching.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The field of legal studies is undergoing rapid changes of a highly diverse nature. Increasing specialization, globalization, the rise of interdisciplinary legal studies, and a growing separation of legal research and teaching prompt the question: What is the aim and method of legal studies? The approach advocated in this article provides a contextual model of legal scholarship. Its most important feature is that the basis for autonomous legal studies lies in the fact that it offers a method of analysis. Legal studies look at the world through the lens of what people ought to do in law. This puts “Law and …” approaches in context: it is impossible to carry out meaningful interdisciplinary work in the law without giving center stage to the question of what the law ought to be. This article explores the consequences of this “inevitable normativity” of legal studies for future academic research and teaching.
Key concepts: Empirical legal studies, Legal research, Legal realism, Legal profession, Legal science, Political science, Context (archaeology), Philosophy of law