2021•Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Boosting and nudging: two paths toward better financial decisions

Ralph Hertwig, Till Grüne‐Yanoff

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Increasingly, policymakers are using insights from psychology and behavioral economics into how people make decisions to inform evidenc-based policy interventions. To date, much of the focus has been on nudges: interventions designed to steer people in a particular direction while preserving their freedom of choice. Yet behavioral science also provides support for a distinct kind of nonfiscal, noncoercive intervention: boosts. The objective of boosts is to foster people’s competence to make their own choices. We explore various dimensions on which boosts differ from nudges, address possible misconceptions, and provide a taxonomy of boosts. We then review and outline boosts that have been proposed and designed to foster people’s competences to make sound finanical decisions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Increasingly, policymakers are using insights from psychology and behavioral economics into how people make decisions to inform evidenc-based policy interventions. To date, much of the focus has been on nudges: interventions designed to steer people in a particular direction while preserving their freedom of choice. Yet behavioral science also provides support for a distinct kind of nonfiscal, noncoercive intervention: boosts. The objective of boosts is to foster people’s competence to make their own choices. We explore various dimensions on which boosts differ from nudges, address possible misconceptions, and provide a taxonomy of boosts. We then review and outline boosts that have been proposed and designed to foster people’s competences to make sound finanical decisions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Increasingly, policymakers are using insights from psychology and behavioral economics into how people make decisions to inform evidenc-based policy interventions. To date, much of the focus has been on nudges: interventions designed to steer people in a particular direction while preserving their freedom of choice. Yet behavioral science also provides support for a distinct kind of nonfiscal, noncoercive intervention: boosts. The objective of boosts is to foster people’s competence to make their own choices. We explore various dimensions on which boosts differ from nudges, address possible misconceptions, and provide a taxonomy of boosts. We then review and outline boosts that have been proposed and designed to foster people’s competences to make sound finanical decisions.

Key concepts: Nudge theory, Choice architecture, Behavioral economics, Psychological intervention, Behavioural economics, Freedom of choice, Boosting (machine learning), Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Boosting and nudging: two paths toward better financial decisions — Research Paper | ScholarLens