Goodwill Impairment Losses and CEO Compensation
Masako N. Darrough, Lale Guler, Ping Wang
Abstract
Masako N. Darrough, Lale Guler, Ping Wang
Abstract
Corporate acquisitions are arguably one of the most important and biggest decisions CEOs have to make; yet many acquisitions do not create value for shareholders. We examine whether CEO compensation is reduced when the fair values of the acquired business units are written down (i.e., goodwill impairment losses are recognized). We find that there is a significant reduction in cash- and option-based CEO compensation as firms recognize goodwill impairment losses. In particular, we find that the decrease in CEO option-based compensation is driven by firms that are not R&D intensive, while the decrease in CEO cash compensation is driven by firms that acquired larger targets in the recent past and have CEOs with a shorter tenure. Our results suggest that compensation committees make CEOs pay a price for non-value maximizing acquisitions and discourage them from further undertaking risky investments especially by reducing the risk-inducing component of their compensation packages.
OpenAlex reports 77 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Corporate acquisitions are arguably one of the most important and biggest decisions CEOs have to make; yet many acquisitions do not create value for shareholders. We examine whether CEO compensation is reduced when the fair values of the acquired business units are written down (i.e., goodwill impairment losses are recognized). We find that there is a significant reduction in cash- and option-based CEO compensation as firms recognize goodwill impairment losses. In particular, we find that the decrease in CEO option-based compensation is driven by firms that are not R&D intensive, while the decrease in CEO cash compensation is driven by firms that acquired larger targets in the recent past and have CEOs with a shorter tenure. Our results suggest that compensation committees make CEOs pay a price for non-value maximizing acquisitions and discourage them from further undertaking risky investments especially by reducing the risk-inducing component of their compensation packages.
Key concepts: Goodwill, Business, Compensation (psychology), Executive compensation, Cash, Shareholder, Enterprise value, Accounting