1996•RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsOpen access

Where Are We Now With Human Capital Theory in Australia

Alison C. Preston

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In the economics school the dominant paradigm for the study of wage determination is the human capital model.Increasingly, however, there is growing discontentment with this model.The catalyst is the empirical literature demonstrating important earnings relationships which cannot be adequately explained by competitive wage theory.ls human capital theory redundant?How useful is the model in the 1990s?This paper provides an assessment of the current empirical status of human capital theory in Australia.The analysis demonstrates that even in a non-competitive environment such as Australia the human capital framework is an extremely useful model for the contemporary study of wage determination.Its weakness is its inability to explain significant and persistent inter-industry, inter-occupation and gender wage differences.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the economics school the dominant paradigm for the study of wage determination is the human capital model.Increasingly, however, there is growing discontentment with this model.The catalyst is the empirical literature demonstrating important earnings relationships which cannot be adequately explained by competitive wage theory.ls human capital theory redundant?How useful is the model in the 1990s?This paper provides an assessment of the current empirical status of human capital theory in Australia.The analysis demonstrates that even in a non-competitive environment such as Australia the human capital framework is an extremely useful model for the contemporary study of wage determination.Its weakness is its inability to explain significant and persistent inter-industry, inter-occupation and gender wage differences.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the economics school the dominant paradigm for the study of wage determination is the human capital model.Increasingly, however, there is growing discontentment with this model.The catalyst is the empirical literature demonstrating important earnings relationships which cannot be adequately explained by competitive wage theory.ls human capital theory redundant?How useful is the model in the 1990s?This paper provides an assessment of the current empirical status of human capital theory in Australia.The analysis demonstrates that even in a non-competitive environment such as Australia the human capital framework is an extremely useful model for the contemporary study of wage determination.Its weakness is its inability to explain significant and persistent inter-industry, inter-occupation and gender wage differences.

Key concepts: Human capital, Human capital theory, Wage, Earnings, Economics, Labour economics, Capital (architecture), Market economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Where Are We Now With Human Capital Theory in Australia — Research Paper | ScholarLens