2014•bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

IS THE CLASS ACTION REALLY DEAD? IS THAT GOOD OR BAD FOR CLASS MEMBERS?

Georgene M. Vairo

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Recent Supreme Court decisions have tightened up the standards for obtaining class certification and virtually eliminate class arbitration as well. However, while the Court has made it more difficult for plaintiffs¿ attorneys to use class resolution of claims as a prosecutorial tool, the lower federal courts appear to relax certification standards when the parties seek to certify a settlement class. Because of the preclusive power of a class action, which binds all class members who do not opt out, the class action remains a potent settlement tool. The 2014 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium panel that served as the foundation for this paper, ¿Binding the Future: Global Settlements and the Death of Representative Litigation,¿ asked, however, whether class settlements are bad for class members. This Article begins by analyzing the Supreme Court¿s certification decisions and agrees with most commentators that although class actions are not dead, the device¿s utility as a prosecution tool has been compromised.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recent Supreme Court decisions have tightened up the standards for obtaining class certification and virtually eliminate class arbitration as well. However, while the Court has made it more difficult for plaintiffs¿ attorneys to use class resolution of claims as a prosecutorial tool, the lower federal courts appear to relax certification standards when the parties seek to certify a settlement class. Because of the preclusive power of a class action, which binds all class members who do not opt out, the class action remains a potent settlement tool. The 2014 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium panel that served as the foundation for this paper, ¿Binding the Future: Global Settlements and the Death of Representative Litigation,¿ asked, however, whether class settlements are bad for class members. This Article begins by analyzing the Supreme Court¿s certification decisions and agrees with most commentators that although class actions are not dead, the device¿s utility as a prosecution tool has been compromised.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recent Supreme Court decisions have tightened up the standards for obtaining class certification and virtually eliminate class arbitration as well. However, while the Court has made it more difficult for plaintiffs¿ attorneys to use class resolution of claims as a prosecutorial tool, the lower federal courts appear to relax certification standards when the parties seek to certify a settlement class. Because of the preclusive power of a class action, which binds all class members who do not opt out, the class action remains a potent settlement tool. The 2014 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium panel that served as the foundation for this paper, ¿Binding the Future: Global Settlements and the Death of Representative Litigation,¿ asked, however, whether class settlements are bad for class members. This Article begins by analyzing the Supreme Court¿s certification decisions and agrees with most commentators that although class actions are not dead, the device¿s utility as a prosecution tool has been compromised.

Key concepts: Class action, Plaintiff, Supreme court, Settlement (finance), Law, Certification, Class (philosophy), Arbitration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
IS THE CLASS ACTION REALLY DEAD? IS THAT GOOD OR BAD FOR CLASS MEMBERS? — Research Paper | ScholarLens