2021•Unpublished venueRequires access

How to Avoid Idolatry

William D. Wood

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Part III calls for a more theological analytic theology and defends analytic theology from some common theological objections. Many theologians regard any form of theistic metaphysics as idolatrous, and worries about “conceptual idolatry” are especially prominent in contemporary theology. In Chapter 7, I try to uncover what idolatry really is. Because idolatry involves false worship, it cannot be assimilated to mistaken believing: idolatry is more than a cognitive error. I first discuss standard and extended senses of “idolatry,” before turning to the tricky problem of conceptual idolatry. While idolatry requires more than false believing, I argue that analytic theologians can (and usually do) avoid idolatry by preserving the creator/creature distinction and theorizing with an attitude of worship.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Part III calls for a more theological analytic theology and defends analytic theology from some common theological objections. Many theologians regard any form of theistic metaphysics as idolatrous, and worries about “conceptual idolatry” are especially prominent in contemporary theology. In Chapter 7, I try to uncover what idolatry really is. Because idolatry involves false worship, it cannot be assimilated to mistaken believing: idolatry is more than a cognitive error. I first discuss standard and extended senses of “idolatry,” before turning to the tricky problem of conceptual idolatry. While idolatry requires more than false believing, I argue that analytic theologians can (and usually do) avoid idolatry by preserving the creator/creature distinction and theorizing with an attitude of worship.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Part III calls for a more theological analytic theology and defends analytic theology from some common theological objections. Many theologians regard any form of theistic metaphysics as idolatrous, and worries about “conceptual idolatry” are especially prominent in contemporary theology. In Chapter 7, I try to uncover what idolatry really is. Because idolatry involves false worship, it cannot be assimilated to mistaken believing: idolatry is more than a cognitive error. I first discuss standard and extended senses of “idolatry,” before turning to the tricky problem of conceptual idolatry. While idolatry requires more than false believing, I argue that analytic theologians can (and usually do) avoid idolatry by preserving the creator/creature distinction and theorizing with an attitude of worship.

Key concepts: Idolatry, Philosophy, Theology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How to Avoid Idolatry — Research Paper | ScholarLens