2012•eYLS (Yale Law School)Requires access

Where Corporations Are: Why Casual Visits to New York Are Bad for Business

Jeanne Lorraine Schroeder, David Gray Carlson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this article, we examine the recent case of Hotel 71 Mezz Lender LLC v. Falor (2010), from the New York Court of Appeals. In this case, New York’s highest court held that LLCs are “present” in New York for jurisdictional purposes when the president of the LLC has submitted to New York jurisdiction in an unrelated law suit against him personally, and where the president came to New York for a deposition in that action. This, we claim, was unconstitutional. In addition, the New York Court of Appeals pronounced itself obliged by the United States Constitution to change the New York law of situs of intangible property. This, we argue, was erroneous. New York is under no constitutional obligation to adopt a specific situs rule about intangible property. Furthermore, the Court of Appeals relied on the situs rule of Harris v. Balk, 198 U.S. 215 (1905) in backward fashion. The Harris case equated the situs of an “account debtor” with the situs of the debt he owed. In Falor, the New York court equated the situs of an LLC with the situs of the equity owners of the LLC, effectively piercing the corporate veil sub silentio. This we view as a profound analytical error that could have far-reaching consequences for business litigation involving interests holders of LLCs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article, we examine the recent case of Hotel 71 Mezz Lender LLC v. Falor (2010), from the New York Court of Appeals. In this case, New York’s highest court held that LLCs are “present” in New York for jurisdictional purposes when the president of the LLC has submitted to New York jurisdiction in an unrelated law suit against him personally, and where the president came to New York for a deposition in that action. This, we claim, was unconstitutional. In addition, the New York Court of Appeals pronounced itself obliged by the United States Constitution to change the New York law of situs of intangible property. This, we argue, was erroneous. New York is under no constitutional obligation to adopt a specific situs rule about intangible property. Furthermore, the Court of Appeals relied on the situs rule of Harris v. Balk, 198 U.S. 215 (1905) in backward fashion. The Harris case equated the situs of an “account debtor” with the situs of the debt he owed. In Falor, the New York court equated the situs of an LLC with the situs of the equity owners of the LLC, effectively piercing the corporate veil sub silentio. This we view as a profound analytical error that could have far-reaching consequences for business litigation involving interests holders of LLCs.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article, we examine the recent case of Hotel 71 Mezz Lender LLC v. Falor (2010), from the New York Court of Appeals. In this case, New York’s highest court held that LLCs are “present” in New York for jurisdictional purposes when the president of the LLC has submitted to New York jurisdiction in an unrelated law suit against him personally, and where the president came to New York for a deposition in that action. This, we claim, was unconstitutional. In addition, the New York Court of Appeals pronounced itself obliged by the United States Constitution to change the New York law of situs of intangible property. This, we argue, was erroneous. New York is under no constitutional obligation to adopt a specific situs rule about intangible property. Furthermore, the Court of Appeals relied on the situs rule of Harris v. Balk, 198 U.S. 215 (1905) in backward fashion. The Harris case equated the situs of an “account debtor” with the situs of the debt he owed. In Falor, the New York court equated the situs of an LLC with the situs of the equity owners of the LLC, effectively piercing the corporate veil sub silentio. This we view as a profound analytical error that could have far-reaching consequences for business litigation involving interests holders of LLCs.

Key concepts: Corporation, Law, Jurisdiction, Casual, Supreme court, Notice, State (computer science), Plaintiff

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Where Corporations Are: Why Casual Visits to New York Are Bad for Business — Research Paper | ScholarLens