The Siskel and Ebert of Financial Markets?: Two Thumbs Down for the Credit Rating Agencies
Frank Partnoy
Abstract
Open-access reader
Frank Partnoy
Abstract
Open-access reader
Is a AAA rating of an institution’s bonds any different from a five-star Morningstar rating of a mutual fund, or a four-diamond American Automobile Association rating of a hotel, or a three-star Michelin rating of a restaurant, or a “two-thumbs-up” Siskel and Ebert rating of a film, or a single UL symbol on a blender? And if bond ratings differ from ratings of mutual funds, hotels, restaurants, films, and appliances, to what extent have legal rules caused those differences? To what extent should legal rules operate to minimize differences? This Article addresses these questions.
OpenAlex reports 210 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Is a AAA rating of an institution’s bonds any different from a five-star Morningstar rating of a mutual fund, or a four-diamond American Automobile Association rating of a hotel, or a three-star Michelin rating of a restaurant, or a “two-thumbs-up” Siskel and Ebert rating of a film, or a single UL symbol on a blender? And if bond ratings differ from ratings of mutual funds, hotels, restaurants, films, and appliances, to what extent have legal rules caused those differences? To what extent should legal rules operate to minimize differences? This Article addresses these questions.
Key concepts: Credit rating, Bond credit rating, Credit enhancement, Issuer, Credit reference, Bond market, Bond, Business