1999Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)Open access

The Siskel and Ebert of Financial Markets?: Two Thumbs Down for the Credit Rating Agencies

Frank Partnoy

Open full text 210 citations

Abstract

Is a AAA rating of an institution’s bonds any different from a five-star Morningstar rating of a mutual fund, or a four-diamond American Automobile Association rating of a hotel, or a three-star Michelin rating of a restaurant, or a “two-thumbs-up” Siskel and Ebert rating of a film, or a single UL symbol on a blender? And if bond ratings differ from ratings of mutual funds, hotels, restaurants, films, and appliances, to what extent have legal rules caused those differences? To what extent should legal rules operate to minimize differences? This Article addresses these questions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Is a AAA rating of an institution’s bonds any different from a five-star Morningstar rating of a mutual fund, or a four-diamond American Automobile Association rating of a hotel, or a three-star Michelin rating of a restaurant, or a “two-thumbs-up” Siskel and Ebert rating of a film, or a single UL symbol on a blender? And if bond ratings differ from ratings of mutual funds, hotels, restaurants, films, and appliances, to what extent have legal rules caused those differences? To what extent should legal rules operate to minimize differences? This Article addresses these questions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 210 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Is a AAA rating of an institution’s bonds any different from a five-star Morningstar rating of a mutual fund, or a four-diamond American Automobile Association rating of a hotel, or a three-star Michelin rating of a restaurant, or a “two-thumbs-up” Siskel and Ebert rating of a film, or a single UL symbol on a blender? And if bond ratings differ from ratings of mutual funds, hotels, restaurants, films, and appliances, to what extent have legal rules caused those differences? To what extent should legal rules operate to minimize differences? This Article addresses these questions.

Key concepts: Credit rating, Bond credit rating, Credit enhancement, Issuer, Credit reference, Bond market, Bond, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Siskel and Ebert of Financial Markets?: Two Thumbs Down for the Credit Rating Agencies — Research Paper | ScholarLens