The Theory of Implementation of Social Choice Rules
Roberto Serrano
Abstract
Open-access reader
Roberto Serrano
Abstract
Open-access reader
Abstract. Suppose that the goals of a society can be summarized in a social choice rule, i.e., a mapping from relevant underlying parameters to final outcomes. Typically, the underly-ing parameters (e.g., individual preferences) are unknown to the public authority. The implementation problem is then formulated: Under what circumstances can one design a mechanism so that the unknown information is truthfully elicited and the social optimum ends up being implemented? In designing such a mechanism, appropriate incentives must be given to the agents so that they do not wish to misrepresent their information. The the-ory of implementation or mechanism design formalizes this “social engineering ” problem and provides answers to the question just posed. I survey the theory of implementation in this article, emphasizing the results under two different benchmarks (that agents have dominant strategies and that they play a Nash equilibrium). Examples discussed include voting, and the allocation of private and public goods under complete and incomplete information.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract. Suppose that the goals of a society can be summarized in a social choice rule, i.e., a mapping from relevant underlying parameters to final outcomes. Typically, the underly-ing parameters (e.g., individual preferences) are unknown to the public authority. The implementation problem is then formulated: Under what circumstances can one design a mechanism so that the unknown information is truthfully elicited and the social optimum ends up being implemented? In designing such a mechanism, appropriate incentives must be given to the agents so that they do not wish to misrepresent their information. The the-ory of implementation or mechanism design formalizes this “social engineering ” problem and provides answers to the question just posed. I survey the theory of implementation in this article, emphasizing the results under two different benchmarks (that agents have dominant strategies and that they play a Nash equilibrium). Examples discussed include voting, and the allocation of private and public goods under complete and incomplete information.
Key concepts: Social choice theory, Mechanism design, Mechanism (biology), Implementation theory, Voting, Private information retrieval, Public good, Incentive