2008RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsOpen access

National Board Certification and Teacher Effectiveness: Evidence from a Random Assignment Experiment

Steven Cantrell, Jon Fullerton, Thomas J. Kane, Doug Staiger

Open full text 36 citations

Abstract

The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) assesses teaching practice based on videos and essays submitted by teachers.We compared the performance of classrooms of elementary students in Los Angeles randomly assigned to NBPTS applicants and to comparison teachers.We used information on whether each applicant achieved certification, along with information on each applicant's NBPTS scaled score and subscores, to test whether the NBPTS score was related to teacher impacts on student achievement.We found that students randomly assigned to highly-rated applicants performed better than students assigned to comparison teachers, while students assigned to poorly-rated applicants performed worse.Estimates were similar using data on pairs of teachers that were not randomly assigned.Our results suggest a number of changes that would improve the predictive power of the NBPTS process.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) assesses teaching practice based on videos and essays submitted by teachers.We compared the performance of classrooms of elementary students in Los Angeles randomly assigned to NBPTS applicants and to comparison teachers.We used information on whether each applicant achieved certification, along with information on each applicant's NBPTS scaled score and subscores, to test whether the NBPTS score was related to teacher impacts on student achievement.We found that students randomly assigned to highly-rated applicants performed better than students assigned to comparison teachers, while students assigned to poorly-rated applicants performed worse.Estimates were similar using data on pairs of teachers that were not randomly assigned.Our results suggest a number of changes that would improve the predictive power of the NBPTS process.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) assesses teaching practice based on videos and essays submitted by teachers.We compared the performance of classrooms of elementary students in Los Angeles randomly assigned to NBPTS applicants and to comparison teachers.We used information on whether each applicant achieved certification, along with information on each applicant's NBPTS scaled score and subscores, to test whether the NBPTS score was related to teacher impacts on student achievement.We found that students randomly assigned to highly-rated applicants performed better than students assigned to comparison teachers, while students assigned to poorly-rated applicants performed worse.Estimates were similar using data on pairs of teachers that were not randomly assigned.Our results suggest a number of changes that would improve the predictive power of the NBPTS process.

Key concepts: Certification, Test (biology), Mathematics education, Psychology, Student achievement, Board certification, Medical education, Pedagogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
National Board Certification and Teacher Effectiveness: Evidence from a Random Assignment Experiment — Research Paper | ScholarLens