2011•RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Darwin’s Theory of Descent with Modification, versus the Biblical Tree of Life

David Penny

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

There is a need to reappraise the different concepts like the 'Tree of Life', and what Darwin meant by them, and how he used the terms. The Tree of Life example is not the only case where Darwin's work has potentially been misunderstood (and will be mentioned later). In contrast to being interested in describing patterns of relationships, it is argued that Darwin appears to have been more interested in the extent to which mechanisms that can be studied in the present are both necessary, and sufficient, to explain events in the past—an approach that is interpreted as being learned from his geological background. URL:[http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001096].

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is a need to reappraise the different concepts like the 'Tree of Life', and what Darwin meant by them, and how he used the terms. The Tree of Life example is not the only case where Darwin's work has potentially been misunderstood (and will be mentioned later). In contrast to being interested in describing patterns of relationships, it is argued that Darwin appears to have been more interested in the extent to which mechanisms that can be studied in the present are both necessary, and sufficient, to explain events in the past—an approach that is interpreted as being learned from his geological background. URL:[http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001096].

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is a need to reappraise the different concepts like the 'Tree of Life', and what Darwin meant by them, and how he used the terms. The Tree of Life example is not the only case where Darwin's work has potentially been misunderstood (and will be mentioned later). In contrast to being interested in describing patterns of relationships, it is argued that Darwin appears to have been more interested in the extent to which mechanisms that can be studied in the present are both necessary, and sufficient, to explain events in the past—an approach that is interpreted as being learned from his geological background. URL:[http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001096].

Key concepts: Darwin (ADL), Tree of life (biology), Tree (set theory), Genealogy, Contrast (vision), Epistemology, Philosophy, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Darwin’s Theory of Descent with Modification, versus the Biblical Tree of Life — Research Paper | ScholarLens