2013The Canadian Bar ReviewOpen access

SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FOR ETHICS COUNSEL: LESSONS FOR CANADA FROM THE UNITED STATES

Stephen G. A. Pitel, Jordan McKie

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Canadian law firms are increasingly designating lawyers within the firm to act as ethics counsel, advising the firm’s other lawyers. This article considers whether communications with ethics counsel should be subject to solicitor-client privilege, so that the firm would not be required to disclose them to the client. While there is virtually no analysis of this issue in a Canadian context, it has been raised in both jurisprudence and commentary in the United States. The first part of this article reviews the American position. The article’s second part considers the Canadian authorities that bear, at least indirectly, on the issue and makes recommendations for the development of Canadian law.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Canadian law firms are increasingly designating lawyers within the firm to act as ethics counsel, advising the firm’s other lawyers. This article considers whether communications with ethics counsel should be subject to solicitor-client privilege, so that the firm would not be required to disclose them to the client. While there is virtually no analysis of this issue in a Canadian context, it has been raised in both jurisprudence and commentary in the United States. The first part of this article reviews the American position. The article’s second part considers the Canadian authorities that bear, at least indirectly, on the issue and makes recommendations for the development of Canadian law.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Canadian law firms are increasingly designating lawyers within the firm to act as ethics counsel, advising the firm’s other lawyers. This article considers whether communications with ethics counsel should be subject to solicitor-client privilege, so that the firm would not be required to disclose them to the client. While there is virtually no analysis of this issue in a Canadian context, it has been raised in both jurisprudence and commentary in the United States. The first part of this article reviews the American position. The article’s second part considers the Canadian authorities that bear, at least indirectly, on the issue and makes recommendations for the development of Canadian law.

Key concepts: Privilege (computing), Jurisprudence, Law, Context (archaeology), Political science, Legal ethics, Subject (documents), Position (finance)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FOR ETHICS COUNSEL: LESSONS FOR CANADA FROM THE UNITED STATES — Research Paper | ScholarLens