2006RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Discrete Choice Models with Multiple Unobserved Choice Characteristics

Susan Athey, Guido W. Imbens

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Since the pioneering work by Daniel McFadden in the 1970s and 1980s (McFadden, 1973, 1981, 1982, 1984) discrete (multinomial) response models based on utility maximization have become an important tool of empirical researchers. A key feature of these models is the specification of utilities associated with the alternatives in terms of choice characteristics and individual preferences. Various generalizations of the basic models have been developed to allow for heterogeneity in taste parameters and heterogeneity in product characteristics that is unobserved to the econometrician. In this paper we investigate how rich a specification of the unobserved components is needed to rationalize arbitrary patterns of choice data (generated by utility-maximizing behavior) in settings with many individual decision makers and large choice sets. We find that in general the model must include at least one unobserved choice characteristic. If, as in common, one restricts the utility function to be monotone in the unobserved choice characteristic, then up to two unobserved choice characteristics may be needed to rationalize the choice data. We illustrate the results using scanner data about yoghurt purchases, employing a Bayesian estimation strategy that is particularly well suited to dealing with multiple unobserved product characteristics. We find that the inclusion of two unobserved choice characteristics leads to more reasonable estimates of elasticities.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the pioneering work by Daniel McFadden in the 1970s and 1980s (McFadden, 1973, 1981, 1982, 1984) discrete (multinomial) response models based on utility maximization have become an important tool of empirical researchers. A key feature of these models is the specification of utilities associated with the alternatives in terms of choice characteristics and individual preferences. Various generalizations of the basic models have been developed to allow for heterogeneity in taste parameters and heterogeneity in product characteristics that is unobserved to the econometrician. In this paper we investigate how rich a specification of the unobserved components is needed to rationalize arbitrary patterns of choice data (generated by utility-maximizing behavior) in settings with many individual decision makers and large choice sets. We find that in general the model must include at least one unobserved choice characteristic. If, as in common, one restricts the utility function to be monotone in the unobserved choice characteristic, then up to two unobserved choice characteristics may be needed to rationalize the choice data. We illustrate the results using scanner data about yoghurt purchases, employing a Bayesian estimation strategy that is particularly well suited to dealing with multiple unobserved product characteristics. We find that the inclusion of two unobserved choice characteristics leads to more reasonable estimates of elasticities.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the pioneering work by Daniel McFadden in the 1970s and 1980s (McFadden, 1973, 1981, 1982, 1984) discrete (multinomial) response models based on utility maximization have become an important tool of empirical researchers. A key feature of these models is the specification of utilities associated with the alternatives in terms of choice characteristics and individual preferences. Various generalizations of the basic models have been developed to allow for heterogeneity in taste parameters and heterogeneity in product characteristics that is unobserved to the econometrician. In this paper we investigate how rich a specification of the unobserved components is needed to rationalize arbitrary patterns of choice data (generated by utility-maximizing behavior) in settings with many individual decision makers and large choice sets. We find that in general the model must include at least one unobserved choice characteristic. If, as in common, one restricts the utility function to be monotone in the unobserved choice characteristic, then up to two unobserved choice characteristics may be needed to rationalize the choice data. We illustrate the results using scanner data about yoghurt purchases, employing a Bayesian estimation strategy that is particularly well suited to dealing with multiple unobserved product characteristics. We find that the inclusion of two unobserved choice characteristics leads to more reasonable estimates of elasticities.

Key concepts: Discrete choice, Utility maximization, Econometrics, Multinomial logistic regression, Multinomial distribution, Monotone polygon, Function (biology), Revealed preference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discrete Choice Models with Multiple Unobserved Choice Characteristics — Research Paper | ScholarLens