Does the constitutional amendment rule matter at all?: Amendment cultures and the challenges of measuring amendment difficulty
T. Ginsburg, J. Gordon Melton
Abstract
Open-access reader
T. Ginsburg, J. Gordon Melton
Abstract
Open-access reader
It is often asserted that the United States’ Constitution is the world’s most difficult to amend. But the basis for this empirical claim is shakier than one might imagine. This article introduces the small social science literature on measuring amendment difficulty and identifies several problems with it. We then go on to argue that a concept of an amendment culture is implicit in many discussions of amendment difficulty. We demonstrate empirically that the choice of amendment rule is a less important predictor of constitutional change than is amendment culture, measured as the rate of amendment in the immediately preceding constitution.
OpenAlex reports 120 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It is often asserted that the United States’ Constitution is the world’s most difficult to amend. But the basis for this empirical claim is shakier than one might imagine. This article introduces the small social science literature on measuring amendment difficulty and identifies several problems with it. We then go on to argue that a concept of an amendment culture is implicit in many discussions of amendment difficulty. We demonstrate empirically that the choice of amendment rule is a less important predictor of constitutional change than is amendment culture, measured as the rate of amendment in the immediately preceding constitution.
Key concepts: Amendment, Constitutional amendment, Constitution, Law, Political science, Search and seizure, First amendment, Supreme court