2015International Journal of Constitutional LawOpen access

Does the constitutional amendment rule matter at all?: Amendment cultures and the challenges of measuring amendment difficulty

T. Ginsburg, J. Gordon Melton

Open full text 120 citations

Abstract

It is often asserted that the United States’ Constitution is the world’s most difficult to amend. But the basis for this empirical claim is shakier than one might imagine. This article introduces the small social science literature on measuring amendment difficulty and identifies several problems with it. We then go on to argue that a concept of an amendment culture is implicit in many discussions of amendment difficulty. We demonstrate empirically that the choice of amendment rule is a less important predictor of constitutional change than is amendment culture, measured as the rate of amendment in the immediately preceding constitution.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is often asserted that the United States’ Constitution is the world’s most difficult to amend. But the basis for this empirical claim is shakier than one might imagine. This article introduces the small social science literature on measuring amendment difficulty and identifies several problems with it. We then go on to argue that a concept of an amendment culture is implicit in many discussions of amendment difficulty. We demonstrate empirically that the choice of amendment rule is a less important predictor of constitutional change than is amendment culture, measured as the rate of amendment in the immediately preceding constitution.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 120 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is often asserted that the United States’ Constitution is the world’s most difficult to amend. But the basis for this empirical claim is shakier than one might imagine. This article introduces the small social science literature on measuring amendment difficulty and identifies several problems with it. We then go on to argue that a concept of an amendment culture is implicit in many discussions of amendment difficulty. We demonstrate empirically that the choice of amendment rule is a less important predictor of constitutional change than is amendment culture, measured as the rate of amendment in the immediately preceding constitution.

Key concepts: Amendment, Constitutional amendment, Constitution, Law, Political science, Search and seizure, First amendment, Supreme court

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does the constitutional amendment rule matter at all?: Amendment cultures and the challenges of measuring amendment difficulty — Research Paper | ScholarLens