2006RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Complementarities among capability, transaction and scale-scope considerations in determining organisational boundaries

Mario Morroni

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the conditions under which capability, transaction and scale considerations interact in determining organisational boundaries. I will argue that this interaction contributes to explaining the individual firm’s performance and growth whenever cognitive competence is limited, radical uncertainty is present, some inputs and processes are indivisible and complementary, and some relevant knowledge is tacit, non-transmittable and characterised by set-up processes with high fixed costs. Under the above conditions, which are becoming increasingly important with the spread of the knowledge-based economy, the growth of the firm can be regarded as a consequence of managerial ability to set a strategy that exploits the mutually reinforcing advantages provided by the organisational coordination of capabilities, transactions and scale of processes, while limiting counteracting forces deriving from errors of strategy that are due to cognitive inertia and myopia, unclear allocation of rights and responsibilities, errors in identifying aims, imprecision in performance measuring, difficulty in focusing incentives, influence activities and problems of internal communication.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the conditions under which capability, transaction and scale considerations interact in determining organisational boundaries. I will argue that this interaction contributes to explaining the individual firm’s performance and growth whenever cognitive competence is limited, radical uncertainty is present, some inputs and processes are indivisible and complementary, and some relevant knowledge is tacit, non-transmittable and characterised by set-up processes with high fixed costs. Under the above conditions, which are becoming increasingly important with the spread of the knowledge-based economy, the growth of the firm can be regarded as a consequence of managerial ability to set a strategy that exploits the mutually reinforcing advantages provided by the organisational coordination of capabilities, transactions and scale of processes, while limiting counteracting forces deriving from errors of strategy that are due to cognitive inertia and myopia, unclear allocation of rights and responsibilities, errors in identifying aims, imprecision in performance measuring, difficulty in focusing incentives, influence activities and problems of internal communication.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the conditions under which capability, transaction and scale considerations interact in determining organisational boundaries. I will argue that this interaction contributes to explaining the individual firm’s performance and growth whenever cognitive competence is limited, radical uncertainty is present, some inputs and processes are indivisible and complementary, and some relevant knowledge is tacit, non-transmittable and characterised by set-up processes with high fixed costs. Under the above conditions, which are becoming increasingly important with the spread of the knowledge-based economy, the growth of the firm can be regarded as a consequence of managerial ability to set a strategy that exploits the mutually reinforcing advantages provided by the organisational coordination of capabilities, transactions and scale of processes, while limiting counteracting forces deriving from errors of strategy that are due to cognitive inertia and myopia, unclear allocation of rights and responsibilities, errors in identifying aims, imprecision in performance measuring, difficulty in focusing incentives, influence activities and problems of internal communication.

Key concepts: Scope (computer science), Transaction cost, Incentive, Exploit, Industrial organization, Scale (ratio), Set (abstract data type), Competence (human resources)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Complementarities among capability, transaction and scale-scope considerations in determining organisational boundaries — Research Paper | ScholarLens