2013Unpublished venueOpen access

Who’s to Blame? Collective Moral Responsibility and Its Implications for Group Members

Margaret Gilbert

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract If we are collectively morally responsible for some action, what does that say about me, and you, distinct individuals whose personal stories may differ widely? This essay probes this question, with special reference to collective moral blameworthiness. It gives an account of this in terms of collective action, collective moral knowledge, and collective freedom of action. It is argued that from collective moral blameworthiness one can infer nothing about the personal blameworthiness of any given member of the collective, whether or not he was a member of the collective at the time the action took place. At the same time, it is intelligible even for those who were not members at that time to acknowledge that “we” were to blame. Given these conclusions, those who consider taking steps against a blameworthy collective must do what they can to avoid harming innocent individuals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract If we are collectively morally responsible for some action, what does that say about me, and you, distinct individuals whose personal stories may differ widely? This essay probes this question, with special reference to collective moral blameworthiness. It gives an account of this in terms of collective action, collective moral knowledge, and collective freedom of action. It is argued that from collective moral blameworthiness one can infer nothing about the personal blameworthiness of any given member of the collective, whether or not he was a member of the collective at the time the action took place. At the same time, it is intelligible even for those who were not members at that time to acknowledge that “we” were to blame. Given these conclusions, those who consider taking steps against a blameworthy collective must do what they can to avoid harming innocent individuals.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract If we are collectively morally responsible for some action, what does that say about me, and you, distinct individuals whose personal stories may differ widely? This essay probes this question, with special reference to collective moral blameworthiness. It gives an account of this in terms of collective action, collective moral knowledge, and collective freedom of action. It is argued that from collective moral blameworthiness one can infer nothing about the personal blameworthiness of any given member of the collective, whether or not he was a member of the collective at the time the action took place. At the same time, it is intelligible even for those who were not members at that time to acknowledge that “we” were to blame. Given these conclusions, those who consider taking steps against a blameworthy collective must do what they can to avoid harming innocent individuals.

Key concepts: Blame, Collective action, Collective responsibility, Moral responsibility, Action (physics), Nothing, Epistemology, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Who’s to Blame? Collective Moral Responsibility and Its Implications for Group Members — Research Paper | ScholarLens