2005•RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsOpen access

The Journey to Work: 25 Years on the Jamaicaway

C D Martland, Martland, Carl D.

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

More than 600 observations were recorded for the author’s home-to-work trip for the same route over the period 1980 to 2004. With this data, it is possible to graph the pattern of travel times and travel time reliability as a function of departure times during the morning rush hour. The image of rush hour performance that emerges from this study is more complex than what is often used in network models or abstract economic analysis. For example, as rush hour progresses, variability increases even though expected travel times start to decline. There may also be lulls in rush hour, i.e. intervals of 10-15 minutes when expected performance temporarily improves. This type of performance cannot realistically be modeled as a linear function of traffic volume, nor can it be approximated using a steady state queuing analysis. It will be far better to view rush hour performance as a steady state cyclical queuing phenomenon: every day may start afresh, but expected conditions on next Tuesday at 830 am are likely to be similar to conditions last Tuesday at that time. Over the 25-year period, there was surprisingly little change in rush hour performance on this congested urban route. Average travel times were mostly in the range of 25-27 minutes with a standard deviation of 3-4 minutes. There was some spreading of the peak, especially during periods involving major construction, but performance in the most recent period was actually equivalent to performance in the 1980s.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

More than 600 observations were recorded for the author’s home-to-work trip for the same route over the period 1980 to 2004. With this data, it is possible to graph the pattern of travel times and travel time reliability as a function of departure times during the morning rush hour. The image of rush hour performance that emerges from this study is more complex than what is often used in network models or abstract economic analysis. For example, as rush hour progresses, variability increases even though expected travel times start to decline. There may also be lulls in rush hour, i.e. intervals of 10-15 minutes when expected performance temporarily improves. This type of performance cannot realistically be modeled as a linear function of traffic volume, nor can it be approximated using a steady state queuing analysis. It will be far better to view rush hour performance as a steady state cyclical queuing phenomenon: every day may start afresh, but expected conditions on next Tuesday at 830 am are likely to be similar to conditions last Tuesday at that time. Over the 25-year period, there was surprisingly little change in rush hour performance on this congested urban route. Average travel times were mostly in the range of 25-27 minutes with a standard deviation of 3-4 minutes. There was some spreading of the peak, especially during periods involving major construction, but performance in the most recent period was actually equivalent to performance in the 1980s.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

More than 600 observations were recorded for the author’s home-to-work trip for the same route over the period 1980 to 2004. With this data, it is possible to graph the pattern of travel times and travel time reliability as a function of departure times during the morning rush hour. The image of rush hour performance that emerges from this study is more complex than what is often used in network models or abstract economic analysis. For example, as rush hour progresses, variability increases even though expected travel times start to decline. There may also be lulls in rush hour, i.e. intervals of 10-15 minutes when expected performance temporarily improves. This type of performance cannot realistically be modeled as a linear function of traffic volume, nor can it be approximated using a steady state queuing analysis. It will be far better to view rush hour performance as a steady state cyclical queuing phenomenon: every day may start afresh, but expected conditions on next Tuesday at 830 am are likely to be similar to conditions last Tuesday at that time. Over the 25-year period, there was surprisingly little change in rush hour performance on this congested urban route. Average travel times were mostly in the range of 25-27 minutes with a standard deviation of 3-4 minutes. There was some spreading of the peak, especially during periods involving major construction, but performance in the most recent period was actually equivalent to performance in the 1980s.

Key concepts: Rush hour, Morning, Queueing theory, Standard deviation, Function (biology), Econometrics, Operations research, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Journey to Work: 25 Years on the Jamaicaway — Research Paper | ScholarLens