2018PubMedRequires access

[Plasmakinetic energy transurethral resection versus transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation and resection of the prostate in the treatment of BPH with the prostate volume <100 ml].

Huai-Sheng Dong, Guo-Jie Gu, Liang-Jun Li, Haibin Zhao, Zhao Dan-dong, Nie Xing-yu

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of plasmakinetic energy transurethral resection of the prostate (PKRP) versus that of transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation and resection of the prostate (PKERP) on the bladder function, sexual function and incidence of complications in BPH patients with the prostate volume <100 ml. METHODS: We randomly assigned 140 BPH patients with the prostate volume <100 ml to receive PKRP (n = 70) or PKERP (n = 70) in our hospital from July 2013 to July 2015. We compared the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), residual urine volume (RUV), and the rates of ED and retrograde ejaculation before and after surgery as well as the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: The Qmax and RUV of the patients were (25.11 ± 7.12) ml/s and (4.06 ± 1.74) ml in the PKERP group postoperatively, significantly improved as compared with the baseline ([8.60 ± 2.33] ml/s and [66.85 ± 14.33] ml, P < 0.05), and even better than (18.87 ± 4.07) ml/s and (9.45 ± 2.66) ml in the PKRP group (P < 0.05). The incidence rates of ED and retrograde ejaculation were 61.43% and 28.57% in the PKRP group, significantly higher than in the PKERP group (40.00% and 14.29%) (P < 0.05) and the baseline (35.71% and 10.00%) (P < 0.05). The postoperative incidence rate of transient urinary incontinence was remarkably higher in the PKERP than in the PKRP group (22.86% vs 8.57%, P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the incidence rates of secondary hemorrhage, urethral injury, or genuine urinary incontinence after operation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PKRP, PKERP can effectively improve the clinical symptoms and signs and protect the bladder function of the BPH patients with the prostate volume <100 ml, but may increase the risk of transient urinary incontinence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of plasmakinetic energy transurethral resection of the prostate (PKRP) versus that of transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation and resection of the prostate (PKERP) on the bladder function, sexual function and incidence of complications in BPH patients with the prostate volume <100 ml. METHODS: We randomly assigned 140 BPH patients with the prostate volume <100 ml to receive PKRP (n = 70) or PKERP (n = 70) in our hospital from July 2013 to July 2015. We compared the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), residual urine volume (RUV), and the rates of ED and retrograde ejaculation before and after surgery as well as the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: The Qmax and RUV of the patients were (25.11 ± 7.12) ml/s and (4.06 ± 1.74) ml in the PKERP group postoperatively, significantly improved as compared with the baseline ([8.60 ± 2.33] ml/s and [66.85 ± 14.33] ml, P < 0.05), and even better than (18.87 ± 4.07) ml/s and (9.45 ± 2.66) ml in the PKRP group (P < 0.05). The incidence rates of ED and retrograde ejaculation were 61.43% and 28.57% in the PKRP group, significantly higher than in the PKERP group (40.00% and 14.29%) (P < 0.05) and the baseline (35.71% and 10.00%) (P < 0.05). The postoperative incidence rate of transient urinary incontinence was remarkably higher in the PKERP than in the PKRP group (22.86% vs 8.57%, P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the incidence rates of secondary hemorrhage, urethral injury, or genuine urinary incontinence after operation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PKRP, PKERP can effectively improve the clinical symptoms and signs and protect the bladder function of the BPH patients with the prostate volume <100 ml, but may increase the risk of transient urinary incontinence.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of plasmakinetic energy transurethral resection of the prostate (PKRP) versus that of transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation and resection of the prostate (PKERP) on the bladder function, sexual function and incidence of complications in BPH patients with the prostate volume <100 ml. METHODS: We randomly assigned 140 BPH patients with the prostate volume <100 ml to receive PKRP (n = 70) or PKERP (n = 70) in our hospital from July 2013 to July 2015. We compared the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), residual urine volume (RUV), and the rates of ED and retrograde ejaculation before and after surgery as well as the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: The Qmax and RUV of the patients were (25.11 ± 7.12) ml/s and (4.06 ± 1.74) ml in the PKERP group postoperatively, significantly improved as compared with the baseline ([8.60 ± 2.33] ml/s and [66.85 ± 14.33] ml, P < 0.05), and even better than (18.87 ± 4.07) ml/s and (9.45 ± 2.66) ml in the PKRP group (P < 0.05). The incidence rates of ED and retrograde ejaculation were 61.43% and 28.57% in the PKRP group, significantly higher than in the PKERP group (40.00% and 14.29%) (P < 0.05) and the baseline (35.71% and 10.00%) (P < 0.05). The postoperative incidence rate of transient urinary incontinence was remarkably higher in the PKERP than in the PKRP group (22.86% vs 8.57%, P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the incidence rates of secondary hemorrhage, urethral injury, or genuine urinary incontinence after operation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PKRP, PKERP can effectively improve the clinical symptoms and signs and protect the bladder function of the BPH patients with the prostate volume <100 ml, but may increase the risk of transient urinary incontinence.

Key concepts: Enucleation, Medicine, Prostate, Urology, Transurethral resection of the prostate, Resection, Sexual function, Incidence (geometry)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Plasmakinetic energy transurethral resection versus transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation and resection of the prostate in the treatment of BPH with the prostate volume <100 ml]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens