2001•Minnesota law reviewOpen access

The Supreme Court Opinion as Institutional Practice: Dissent, Legal Scholarship, and Decisionmaking in the Taft Court

Robert C. Post

Abstract

Senate Chamber, whose intimate, elegant surroundings echoed with the debates of Webster, Clay, and Calhoun. 2 Its administrative staff and offices were scattered haphazardly and inefficiently throughout the Capitol.3 It was Taft who, with great skill and patience, t I am very grateful for the advice and insight of friends and colleagues.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Key concepts: Law, Majority opinion, Supreme court, Acquiescence, Law of the case, Precedent, Dissenting opinion, Court of record