2002•Unpublished venueOpen access

Is Lumpy Investment Relevant for the Business Cycle?

Julia K. Thomas

Open full text 53 citations

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that discrete and occasional plant-level capital adjustments have significant aggregate implications.In particular, it has been argued that changes in plants' willingness to invest in response to aggregate shocks can at times generate large movements in total investment demand.In this study, I re-assess these predictions in a general equilibrium environment.Specifically, assuming nonconvex costs of capital adjustment, I derive generalized (S,s) adjustment rules yielding lumpy plant-level investment within an otherwise standard equilibrium business cycle model.In contrast to previous partial equilibrium analyses, model results reveal that the aggregate effects of lumpy investment are negligible.In general equilibrium, households' preference for relatively smooth consumption profiles offsets changes in aggregate investment demand implied by the introduction of lumpy plant-level investment.As a result, adjustments in wages and interest rates yield quantity dynamics that are virtually indistinguishable from the standard model.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Previous research has suggested that discrete and occasional plant-level capital adjustments have significant aggregate implications.In particular, it has been argued that changes in plants' willingness to invest in response to aggregate shocks can at times generate large movements in total investment demand.In this study, I re-assess these predictions in a general equilibrium environment.Specifically, assuming nonconvex costs of capital adjustment, I derive generalized (S,s) adjustment rules yielding lumpy plant-level investment within an otherwise standard equilibrium business cycle model.In contrast to previous partial equilibrium analyses, model results reveal that the aggregate effects of lumpy investment are negligible.In general equilibrium, households' preference for relatively smooth consumption profiles offsets changes in aggregate investment demand implied by the introduction of lumpy plant-level investment.As a result, adjustments in wages and interest rates yield quantity dynamics that are virtually indistinguishable from the standard model.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 53 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Previous research has suggested that discrete and occasional plant-level capital adjustments have significant aggregate implications.In particular, it has been argued that changes in plants' willingness to invest in response to aggregate shocks can at times generate large movements in total investment demand.In this study, I re-assess these predictions in a general equilibrium environment.Specifically, assuming nonconvex costs of capital adjustment, I derive generalized (S,s) adjustment rules yielding lumpy plant-level investment within an otherwise standard equilibrium business cycle model.In contrast to previous partial equilibrium analyses, model results reveal that the aggregate effects of lumpy investment are negligible.In general equilibrium, households' preference for relatively smooth consumption profiles offsets changes in aggregate investment demand implied by the introduction of lumpy plant-level investment.As a result, adjustments in wages and interest rates yield quantity dynamics that are virtually indistinguishable from the standard model.

Key concepts: Economics, Investment (military), Business cycle, Aggregate (composite), Consumption (sociology), General equilibrium theory, Microeconomics, Capital (architecture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is Lumpy Investment Relevant for the Business Cycle? — Research Paper | ScholarLens