1994RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsOpen access

Transaction Cost Economics and Contractual Relations

Maria Maher

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

One of the key factors in the study of transaction costs economics is the concept of opportunism. Williamson (1986) develops a heuristic model of transaction costs and governance structures, in which the critical dimensions with respect to which transaction costs differ are identified. These dimensions are the frequency of exchange, the degree of relationship-specific investment, and uncertainty. This work examines if empirically, through the use of case studies, there is support for Williamson's model. Firms in four different industries were interviewed about their contractual relationships with their customers or suppliers. The degree of asset specificity and transaction costs differs across these industries and across firms within an industriy. We find that there is strong support for the Williamson model, however, a critical dimension that is omitted from the model is market structure. By affecting the number of alternative sellers and buyers, and hence the risk of opportunism, we find that market structure also has important consequences for the nature of contractual relations to be found governing firms' transactions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One of the key factors in the study of transaction costs economics is the concept of opportunism. Williamson (1986) develops a heuristic model of transaction costs and governance structures, in which the critical dimensions with respect to which transaction costs differ are identified. These dimensions are the frequency of exchange, the degree of relationship-specific investment, and uncertainty. This work examines if empirically, through the use of case studies, there is support for Williamson's model. Firms in four different industries were interviewed about their contractual relationships with their customers or suppliers. The degree of asset specificity and transaction costs differs across these industries and across firms within an industriy. We find that there is strong support for the Williamson model, however, a critical dimension that is omitted from the model is market structure. By affecting the number of alternative sellers and buyers, and hence the risk of opportunism, we find that market structure also has important consequences for the nature of contractual relations to be found governing firms' transactions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One of the key factors in the study of transaction costs economics is the concept of opportunism. Williamson (1986) develops a heuristic model of transaction costs and governance structures, in which the critical dimensions with respect to which transaction costs differ are identified. These dimensions are the frequency of exchange, the degree of relationship-specific investment, and uncertainty. This work examines if empirically, through the use of case studies, there is support for Williamson's model. Firms in four different industries were interviewed about their contractual relationships with their customers or suppliers. The degree of asset specificity and transaction costs differs across these industries and across firms within an industriy. We find that there is strong support for the Williamson model, however, a critical dimension that is omitted from the model is market structure. By affecting the number of alternative sellers and buyers, and hence the risk of opportunism, we find that market structure also has important consequences for the nature of contractual relations to be found governing firms' transactions.

Key concepts: Opportunism, Transaction cost, Asset specificity, Corporate governance, Microeconomics, Industrial organization, Dimension (graph theory), Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transaction Cost Economics and Contractual Relations — Research Paper | ScholarLens