Estimating Personal Consumption with and Without Savings in Wrongful Death Cases
Martine T. Ajwa, Gerald D. Martin, Ted Vavoulis
Abstract
Martine T. Ajwa, Gerald D. Martin, Ted Vavoulis
Abstract
In wrongful death cases, forensic economists consider personal consumption costs of a decedent when determining economic damages. Many previous consumption studies have ignored savings as delayed consumption in their figures. As a result, the economist’s deductions for a decedent’s consumption will be too low. This study presents consumption tables and regression equations which both include and exclude various forms of savings. The data used are taken from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Expenditure Surveys. Results indicate that in households with $40,000 or more income, consumption figures are higher when savings are considered.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In wrongful death cases, forensic economists consider personal consumption costs of a decedent when determining economic damages. Many previous consumption studies have ignored savings as delayed consumption in their figures. As a result, the economist’s deductions for a decedent’s consumption will be too low. This study presents consumption tables and regression equations which both include and exclude various forms of savings. The data used are taken from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Expenditure Surveys. Results indicate that in households with $40,000 or more income, consumption figures are higher when savings are considered.
Key concepts: Wrongful death, Consumption (sociology), Damages, Personal consumption expenditures price index, Economics, Autonomous consumption, Actuarial science, Personal income