2021•PandemicsOpen access

A step change in security and preparedness

Elisa Pieri

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter reviews the institutions, legal frameworks and international guidelines that have been introduced to tackle pandemics and the risks of novel infectious disease outbreaks in the last 20 years, and following the SARS outbreak, to prepare, mitigate and respond at various levels, nationally and internationally. The chapter discusses issues of continuity and discontinuity between outbreaks (for instance the argument about intense and extensive mobility today, versus what happened in the past) and introduces political debates about global health governance today. This includes considering whether pandemic preparedness can be regarded as a priority for the West first and foremost. It involves discussing its relevance to the needs of the Global South, for instance in relation to tackling other serious widespread (or endemic) diseases such as malaria, which cause a much higher death toll already every day in many parts of the African continent. The chapter also addresses the tensions that emerge when working globally within WHO-led frameworks for collaboration on surveillance and data sharing. It discusses the disputes that sometimes arise, also in relation to collaborations with the pharmaceutical industry and other public-private partnerships and funders.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter reviews the institutions, legal frameworks and international guidelines that have been introduced to tackle pandemics and the risks of novel infectious disease outbreaks in the last 20 years, and following the SARS outbreak, to prepare, mitigate and respond at various levels, nationally and internationally. The chapter discusses issues of continuity and discontinuity between outbreaks (for instance the argument about intense and extensive mobility today, versus what happened in the past) and introduces political debates about global health governance today. This includes considering whether pandemic preparedness can be regarded as a priority for the West first and foremost. It involves discussing its relevance to the needs of the Global South, for instance in relation to tackling other serious widespread (or endemic) diseases such as malaria, which cause a much higher death toll already every day in many parts of the African continent. The chapter also addresses the tensions that emerge when working globally within WHO-led frameworks for collaboration on surveillance and data sharing. It discusses the disputes that sometimes arise, also in relation to collaborations with the pharmaceutical industry and other public-private partnerships and funders.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter reviews the institutions, legal frameworks and international guidelines that have been introduced to tackle pandemics and the risks of novel infectious disease outbreaks in the last 20 years, and following the SARS outbreak, to prepare, mitigate and respond at various levels, nationally and internationally. The chapter discusses issues of continuity and discontinuity between outbreaks (for instance the argument about intense and extensive mobility today, versus what happened in the past) and introduces political debates about global health governance today. This includes considering whether pandemic preparedness can be regarded as a priority for the West first and foremost. It involves discussing its relevance to the needs of the Global South, for instance in relation to tackling other serious widespread (or endemic) diseases such as malaria, which cause a much higher death toll already every day in many parts of the African continent. The chapter also addresses the tensions that emerge when working globally within WHO-led frameworks for collaboration on surveillance and data sharing. It discusses the disputes that sometimes arise, also in relation to collaborations with the pharmaceutical industry and other public-private partnerships and funders.

Key concepts: Preparedness, Computer security, Business, Political science, Computer science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A step change in security and preparedness — Research Paper | ScholarLens