2018World EconomyRequires access

False friends? Empirical evidence on trade policy substitution in regional trade agreements

Magdalene Silberberger, Frederik Stender

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we examine the interplay of regional economic integration and the use of bilateral antidumping ( AD ) measures. Our empirical analysis brings three central findings to light: (i) we find that regional trade agreements ( RTA s) generally reduce the likelihood of AD activity among integration partners; (ii) in addition, an improvement in the tariff treatment between trading partners—regardless of whether expressed as the directly faced tariff or as a tariff margin— generally leads to a lower likelihood of bilateral AD and (iii) regarding the interaction of both events, however, a reciprocally higher tariff margin between integration partners leads to a higher likelihood of bilateral AD than an equal tariff margin among non‐integration trading partners. The latter effect seems to be primarily driven by those RTA s with a participation of “South” countries.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In this paper, we examine the interplay of regional economic integration and the use of bilateral antidumping ( AD ) measures. Our empirical analysis brings three central findings to light: (i) we find that regional trade agreements ( RTA s) generally reduce the likelihood of AD activity among integration partners; (ii) in addition, an improvement in the tariff treatment between trading partners—regardless of whether expressed as the directly faced tariff or as a tariff margin— generally leads to a lower likelihood of bilateral AD and (iii) regarding the interaction of both events, however, a reciprocally higher tariff margin between integration partners leads to a higher likelihood of bilateral AD than an equal tariff margin among non‐integration trading partners. The latter effect seems to be primarily driven by those RTA s with a participation of “South” countries.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In this paper, we examine the interplay of regional economic integration and the use of bilateral antidumping ( AD ) measures. Our empirical analysis brings three central findings to light: (i) we find that regional trade agreements ( RTA s) generally reduce the likelihood of AD activity among integration partners; (ii) in addition, an improvement in the tariff treatment between trading partners—regardless of whether expressed as the directly faced tariff or as a tariff margin— generally leads to a lower likelihood of bilateral AD and (iii) regarding the interaction of both events, however, a reciprocally higher tariff margin between integration partners leads to a higher likelihood of bilateral AD than an equal tariff margin among non‐integration trading partners. The latter effect seems to be primarily driven by those RTA s with a participation of “South” countries.

Key concepts: Tariff, Margin (machine learning), Economics, Substitution (logic), International economics, Economic integration, Bilateral trade, Regional integration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
False friends? Empirical evidence on trade policy substitution in regional trade agreements — Research Paper | ScholarLens