Does Ambiguity Diversification Pay
Yehuda Izhakian
Abstract
Open-access reader
Yehuda Izhakian
Abstract
Open-access reader
With a focus on risk, classical portfolio theory assumes that probabilities of future outcomes are known. In reality, however, there is ambiguity in these probabilities. This paper studies the nature of the relationship between risk and ambiguity and proves that in most cases ambiguity cannot be diversified without increasing risk. This insight implies that holding a fully diversified portfolio is not necessarily optimal. It challenges the conventional wisdom which asserts that investors should hold such a portfolio.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
With a focus on risk, classical portfolio theory assumes that probabilities of future outcomes are known. In reality, however, there is ambiguity in these probabilities. This paper studies the nature of the relationship between risk and ambiguity and proves that in most cases ambiguity cannot be diversified without increasing risk. This insight implies that holding a fully diversified portfolio is not necessarily optimal. It challenges the conventional wisdom which asserts that investors should hold such a portfolio.
Key concepts: Ambiguity, Diversification (marketing strategy), Portfolio, Modern portfolio theory, Economics, Focus (optics), Financial economics, Actuarial science