2010SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Malaysia - Death of a Separate Constitutional Judicial Power

Richard Foo

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This article examines the position of the separation of powers doctrine within the Federal Constitution of Malaysia and in particular, the position of 'the judicial power of the Federation' before and after the 1988 constitutional amendment to Article 121. Through textual analysis and a review of the extant case law, conclusions are offered regarding the manner in which the separation doctrine is incorporated within the Constitution and whether its principles may apply with implicit constitutional force, the efficacy of the 1988 amendment to effect substantive constitutional change, and whether 'the judicial power of the Federation' remains exclusively vested in the courts established under Article 121. The Federal Court's decision in Public Prosecutor v. Kok Wah Kuan [2008] 1 M.L.J. 1 is discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article examines the position of the separation of powers doctrine within the Federal Constitution of Malaysia and in particular, the position of 'the judicial power of the Federation' before and after the 1988 constitutional amendment to Article 121. Through textual analysis and a review of the extant case law, conclusions are offered regarding the manner in which the separation doctrine is incorporated within the Constitution and whether its principles may apply with implicit constitutional force, the efficacy of the 1988 amendment to effect substantive constitutional change, and whether 'the judicial power of the Federation' remains exclusively vested in the courts established under Article 121. The Federal Court's decision in Public Prosecutor v. Kok Wah Kuan [2008] 1 M.L.J. 1 is discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article examines the position of the separation of powers doctrine within the Federal Constitution of Malaysia and in particular, the position of 'the judicial power of the Federation' before and after the 1988 constitutional amendment to Article 121. Through textual analysis and a review of the extant case law, conclusions are offered regarding the manner in which the separation doctrine is incorporated within the Constitution and whether its principles may apply with implicit constitutional force, the efficacy of the 1988 amendment to effect substantive constitutional change, and whether 'the judicial power of the Federation' remains exclusively vested in the courts established under Article 121. The Federal Court's decision in Public Prosecutor v. Kok Wah Kuan [2008] 1 M.L.J. 1 is discussed.

Key concepts: Constitution, Doctrine, Law, Judicial review, Extant taxon, Political science, Separation of powers, Power (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Malaysia - Death of a Separate Constitutional Judicial Power — Research Paper | ScholarLens