ScholarLens Back to search
2013•KU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas)Open access

Originalism, Balanced Legal Realism and Judicial Selection: A Case Study

Stephen J. Ware

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.

Key concepts: Lawmaking, Law, Political science, Judicial activism, State (computer science), Supreme court, Legislature, Democracy

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Originalism, Balanced Legal Realism and Judicial Selection: A Case Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens