2013•2013 Meeting PapersRequires access

Optimal Domestic Sovereign Default

Enrique G. Mendoza

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Infrequent but dramatic episodes of outright default on domestic sovereign debt are an important historical fact that remains unexplained. We propose an incomplete-markets, heterogeneous-agents model in which domestic default can be optimal for a utilitarian government that responds to distributional incentives. The government finances the gap between stochastic expenditures and lump-sum taxes by issuing non–state-contingent debt, but it retains the option to default. The distribution of public debt across private agents is endogenous and interacts with the government's optimal default, debt issuance and tax decisions. Repaying is beneficial because it allows the government to access the debt market and provides a mechanism for households to self insure and smooth consumption, but it also increases the need for future tax revenues. Default is optimal when repaying hurts relatively poor agents more than defaulting hurts relatively rich agents, and this occurs along an equilibrium path when public debt is high enough and its ownership is sufficiently concentrated. Unlike standard models of external sovereign default, the model supports realistic debt-output ratios on average (40%) and before default (60%) at a nontrivial default frequency (8%).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Infrequent but dramatic episodes of outright default on domestic sovereign debt are an important historical fact that remains unexplained. We propose an incomplete-markets, heterogeneous-agents model in which domestic default can be optimal for a utilitarian government that responds to distributional incentives. The government finances the gap between stochastic expenditures and lump-sum taxes by issuing non–state-contingent debt, but it retains the option to default. The distribution of public debt across private agents is endogenous and interacts with the government's optimal default, debt issuance and tax decisions. Repaying is beneficial because it allows the government to access the debt market and provides a mechanism for households to self insure and smooth consumption, but it also increases the need for future tax revenues. Default is optimal when repaying hurts relatively poor agents more than defaulting hurts relatively rich agents, and this occurs along an equilibrium path when public debt is high enough and its ownership is sufficiently concentrated. Unlike standard models of external sovereign default, the model supports realistic debt-output ratios on average (40%) and before default (60%) at a nontrivial default frequency (8%).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Infrequent but dramatic episodes of outright default on domestic sovereign debt are an important historical fact that remains unexplained. We propose an incomplete-markets, heterogeneous-agents model in which domestic default can be optimal for a utilitarian government that responds to distributional incentives. The government finances the gap between stochastic expenditures and lump-sum taxes by issuing non–state-contingent debt, but it retains the option to default. The distribution of public debt across private agents is endogenous and interacts with the government's optimal default, debt issuance and tax decisions. Repaying is beneficial because it allows the government to access the debt market and provides a mechanism for households to self insure and smooth consumption, but it also increases the need for future tax revenues. Default is optimal when repaying hurts relatively poor agents more than defaulting hurts relatively rich agents, and this occurs along an equilibrium path when public debt is high enough and its ownership is sufficiently concentrated. Unlike standard models of external sovereign default, the model supports realistic debt-output ratios on average (40%) and before default (60%) at a nontrivial default frequency (8%).

Key concepts: Sovereign default, Default, Debt, Monetary economics, Government debt, Economics, Incentive, Government (linguistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Optimal Domestic Sovereign Default — Research Paper | ScholarLens