2017The Journal of RiskRequires access

Default risk charge: modeling framework for the “Basel” risk measure

Sascha Wilkens, Mirela Predescu

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

As a result of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s Fundamental Review of the Trading Book, revised standards for capital requirements for market risk in banks’ trading books have been issued. Under the new standards, default risk needs to be measured and capitalized through a dedicated default risk charge (DRC). Although quantitative impact studies are ongoing and banks are preparing for these regulatory changes, this paper is the first to present a modeling framework for the DRC measure that projects losses over a one-year capital horizon at a 99.9% confidence level. We discuss selected risk factor models, which we use to derive simulation-based loss distributions and associated default risk figures. The model’s properties, aspects of its implementation and a comparison with the standardized approach for default risk are explored through the use of example portfolios.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As a result of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s Fundamental Review of the Trading Book, revised standards for capital requirements for market risk in banks’ trading books have been issued. Under the new standards, default risk needs to be measured and capitalized through a dedicated default risk charge (DRC). Although quantitative impact studies are ongoing and banks are preparing for these regulatory changes, this paper is the first to present a modeling framework for the DRC measure that projects losses over a one-year capital horizon at a 99.9% confidence level. We discuss selected risk factor models, which we use to derive simulation-based loss distributions and associated default risk figures. The model’s properties, aspects of its implementation and a comparison with the standardized approach for default risk are explored through the use of example portfolios.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As a result of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s Fundamental Review of the Trading Book, revised standards for capital requirements for market risk in banks’ trading books have been issued. Under the new standards, default risk needs to be measured and capitalized through a dedicated default risk charge (DRC). Although quantitative impact studies are ongoing and banks are preparing for these regulatory changes, this paper is the first to present a modeling framework for the DRC measure that projects losses over a one-year capital horizon at a 99.9% confidence level. We discuss selected risk factor models, which we use to derive simulation-based loss distributions and associated default risk figures. The model’s properties, aspects of its implementation and a comparison with the standardized approach for default risk are explored through the use of example portfolios.

Key concepts: Risk-weighted asset, Basel II, Capital requirement, Basel III, Operational risk, Actuarial science, Loss given default, Market risk

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Default risk charge: modeling framework for the “Basel” risk measure — Research Paper | ScholarLens