2019Preprints.orgOpen access

What do a Longest Increasing Subsequence and a Longest Decreasing Subsequence Know About Each Other?

Elizabeth J. Itskovich, Vadim E. Levit

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

As a kind of converse of the celebrated Erd˝os-Szekeres theorem, we present a necessary and sufficient condition for a sequence of length n to contain a longest increasing subsequence and a longest decreasing subsequence of given lengths x and y, respectively.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As a kind of converse of the celebrated Erd˝os-Szekeres theorem, we present a necessary and sufficient condition for a sequence of length n to contain a longest increasing subsequence and a longest decreasing subsequence of given lengths x and y, respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As a kind of converse of the celebrated Erd˝os-Szekeres theorem, we present a necessary and sufficient condition for a sequence of length n to contain a longest increasing subsequence and a longest decreasing subsequence of given lengths x and y, respectively.

Key concepts: Subsequence, Longest increasing subsequence, Converse, Longest common subsequence problem, Combinatorics, Sequence (biology), Mathematics, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What do a Longest Increasing Subsequence and a Longest Decreasing Subsequence Know About Each Other? — Research Paper | ScholarLens